TheDutchServer you crossed the line of norms

(Mateos) #161

You may consider the 2.55 to 2.60 changelog.

(acQu) #162

abc.

-.

(Nail) #163

all this “facade” server redirect bull **** pisses me off, hellreturn and Dutch Vincent seem to be the most blatant abusers/annoyances, I’d suggest you both stick to your actual servers and remove all the “virtual” fake crap, you’re disrespecting the game and its’ players

(Domagoj) #164

He is again redirecting everyone to his server ip: 217.123.25.94:27960

please someone blacklist it!

(nonoMapper) #165

I wish SD would take some action in form of communicating with the ones hosting the serverlist or maintain them.

Mhmm, he is at the telecom company Ziggo in the Netherlands and uses a dynamic ip. Is Badman or someone else of the SD team not capable of sorting this out? I mean, every normal company would take legal actions after a while - even if the game is very outdated.

Can a SD member tell us honestly if we have to live with this or not…no “maybes” perhaps;)

Isnt a little investment good for the SD fanbase? many people are just fans of wolfet & rtcw. Not brink. Not etqw, but we are waiting for a good title from SD. We(or only me) are just quake3 engine players and love the movement, speed and even the outdated gfx. Those doesnt even matter that much cause the gameplay is good & fun. Just until today you did not manage to convince us q3/rtcw/et players. Well, not me that is and i am not sitting on the quake3 engine…just waiting for an equal good game from you…not for free and not caring which engine you use;) On the other side, you managed to slow down every engine you got your hands on. From my experience.

btw. deleting a fake server from the list is doing what exactly when the guy has a dynamic ip?

An answer on “if we have to live with this serverlist situation or not” will be highly appreciated:)

(stealth6) #166

[QUOTE=Domagoj;401607]He is again redirecting everyone to his server ip: 217.123.25.94:27960

please someone blacklist it![/QUOTE]

Does this only happen on version 2.55?

(Domagoj) #167

no he is redirecting 2.6b version only.

(Mateos) #168

Master Server belongs to iD; This is a 9 years old free video game no longer supported. Just as a reminder :slight_smile:

Don’t expect immediate reaction in other words.

(Nail) #169

not so sure, id is pretty good about these things, you might be surprised Mateos

(Mateos) #170

Then wait and see :confused:

(Patriotqube) #171

[QUOTE=BigBear;401572]Hi!
My Servers are 2.55+ (2.55/2.60)
I use No facade (I have the .so but I do not use it because I see no interest!!!).

I see no interest to use 2.6X ; many prefer to play with 2.55
*But I understand some prefer 2.6X : Players are free to decide *[/QUOTE]

Only reason im running 2.55+ today is because with that and a facade i can show my server to all et players.
the servers i have running with 2.60b i can only show to them.

Saying that many prefers 2.55 isnt a reason to say lets use it, many ppl prefers 2.55 because thats the file they gets when they search on the major download sites, and because ET dosent have an autoupdate feature, and the fact that they can find 2.55 servers means that many of them dosent bother to update to 2.60b infact many of them dosent know howto.

ETPro 3.2.6 and NQ 1.2.9 can only run on 2.60b. and 2.60b is the newer and updated version of 2.55 so therefor the 2.60b should be considered the better alternative.

again imo ppl that prefers 2.55 in most cases are ppl that dosent know better !!!

removing the serverlist for 2.55 will force serveradmins to migrate to 2.60b and thereby also all ppl playing ET, and it will make all the facades redundant

cant really see any downsides to that…

Im using a 2.60b client only and in my personal experience it just runs better and more smothly nomatter if im on a 2.55+ or 2.60b server

(Mateos) #172

So why the QGC server appears 3 times in the 2.60b list?

(Patriotqube) #173

To my knowledge they dont

go there http://et.trackbase.net/?mod=serverlist and search for ip 81.91.242.31 which is the only IP im using for our servers

81.91.242.31:27960 --> 2.60b ETPro with Tzac
81.91.242.31:27962 --> 2.55+b Jaymod Sniperserver port 27972 is facade
81.91.242.31:27963 --> 2.60b NQ 1.2.9 Server
81.91.242.31:27964 --> 2.55+ Jaymod Fun server port 27974 is facade
81.91.242.31:27966 --> 2.55+ Jaymod NoDownload Server port 27976 is facade
81.91.242.31:27967 --> 2.55+ Silent Fun Server port 27977 is facade
81.91.242.31:27968 --> 2.55+ ETPub Fun server port 27978 is facade

so in total should give 12 different servers, which it does

If other IP’s are using our QGC well then someone else is doing it. My server is located in London UK and only exception from that IP is our Brink server, both our COD4 and TS3 also uses it.

anyway how many facades im setting up or others are setting up has nothing todo with my point as described above

but ok its fair enough you want your troll posts out there

(Mateos) #174

Two days ago I had 3 Boot Camp listed, but it’s name is now NoQuarter FUN XPS (Added it to Xf favs when you announced it).

(Patriotqube) #175

Its long time ago i changed name, and tbh thats a 2.60b server so never had a facade added there

(Paul) #176

[QUOTE=Domagoj;401607]He is again redirecting everyone to his server ip: 217.123.25.94:27960

please someone blacklist it![/QUOTE]

Next time send the message through on xfire, I can remove his server from the masterlist :slight_smile:

(acQu) #177

Ah uh. So you have full control over id masterserver and can create policies ? Do they let you recompile ?

P.S. i always wanted to take a look at the source as well :cool: :penguin: :stroggtapir:

(Dutch_Vincent) #178

Paul king of the serverlist repair it :slight_smile:
I think i have found a bug in wolfenstein enemy territory?

[video]http://members.ziggo.nl/w.admiraal/et/wolfensteinserverlist.avi[/video]

only way to stop attacking my network :slight_smile:

(hellreturn) #179

woha… hold on their… I didn’t abuse or do anything like Dutch Vincent did…

I can prove it in real time… that mostly all servers on 2.55 uses server facade. Go and whine on them also cos replies like yours doesn’t piss me off since I understand it’s human nature to join bash wagon half time without actually checking…

Either you didn’t read my all posts or you just jumping on the ship.

http://fearless-assassins.com/forum/page/enemyterritory-servers.html

We run more then 10 ET servers on 2.55 and if I add server facade like EVERY admin here… how many servers it make??? Do I need to teach maths here? If by running server facade, I am abusing then I believe most of the admins from 2.55 running server facade are abusers. Using server facade it gives u option for redirect… is that really hard to understand? U only get redirected if u choose “Yes”… is that simple thing really hard to understand? I am no different then other admins who also run server facade for their servers and I will remove mine once other 2.55 admins also remove theirs.

So now just to please others, I need to stop providing servers at Chicago, NY, France, Germany and Dallas, rather then adding more servers for players ? Well forget it…

We also provide game server to other ET players. i.e. our customers also get same IP like ours. Does that mean I own their servers? Hack no. It’s their server and they can do whatever they like with their server unless and until they are not violating our hosting ToS.

http://fearless-assassins.com/store/

Again this is just general post and I have nothing against you… Now to piss of jealous admins I am going to start more new “real no facade” servers… I personally don’t care if servers has players or not…but they would be open to anyone who likes to play on it… ETPro, Nitmod and one some new mod… If someone doesn’t like to play on it then don’t… but jealous admins are free to whine about it … To other good admins and players if u find cheaters or trouble makers on new servers PM me with “proof” and I will take care of it.

(Mateos) #180

Why may I do something when someone else did something worse, that’s it?

hellreturn is not going to change anything, why people continue this discussion?