haha, i hope so 
p.s.
and im also heard alot of stories about people, who prefer make love with walls[both by loving holes and by hitting own head on it], corpses, animals, kids and etc.
haha, i hope so 
p.s.
and im also heard alot of stories about people, who prefer make love with walls[both by loving holes and by hitting own head on it], corpses, animals, kids and etc.
[QUOTE=brbrbr;211499]haha, i hope so 
p.s.
and im also heard alot of stories about people, who prefer make love with walls[both by loving holes and by hitting own head on it], corpses, animals, kids and etc.[/QUOTE]
ha ha ha
Oh my! I can see I better not encourage you. 
you’d take a lowly mouse over the intelligence of a human? TRAITOR!
If mice is greater than all, then how come eagles can catch them so easily? HUH?
sure.
its a shame, R&D 4 2D input device of THAT types almost stopped, focusing on apperarance-ergonomics, only.
while there is a much thing to do for improving actual performance, instead improving L&F[which is important, but not so critical as existed flaws elemination].
[QUOTE=brbrbr;211622]sure.
its a shame, R&Dthats 2D input device of THAT types almost stopped, focusing on apprarance-ergonomics, only.
while there is a much thing to do for improving actual performance, instead improving L&F[which is important, but not so critical as existed flaws elemination].[/QUOTE]
If something was obvious it would have been done already. Companies aren’t in the habit of not doing things that will earn them money.
What would you suggest to improve the mouse?
ha ha ha ha ha I’m sorry, I’ll take the blame for this one… though Tokamak set the trap up p_q
Isn’t OT when you and your opponent are tied, and then you go into OT? And that OT is over when one team scores?
Or OT meaning that you work during the times you weren’t supposed to be working?
Ok carry on.
about computer input devices, called “Mouse”.
and their sub-variations, like trackballs[in like to use some in early mouse days], and touchpads[have perfomance acceptable only 4 occasional use].
no [significant]improvement for years.
of course, some compaines make my proud by attempts, but they do its not for long, b-cause, alone and b-cause weak sales.
for example, two now deceased US compaines and one Chinese, which is stil alive[named 4Tech].
[QUOTE=Senethro;211633]
What would you suggest to improve the mouse?[/QUOTE]
its two million dollars question[each years].
and unless i involed in mouse R&D i keep my ideas for myself.
point is, nowdays mouse designers - suxx.
narrow-seeing morons with zero technical creativity and zero will to push technologies 2 somewhere[to fix things].
[QUOTE=Senethro;211633]If something was obvious it would have been done already. Companies aren’t in the habit of not doing things that will earn them money.
What would you suggest to improve the mouse?[/QUOTE]
get rid of it altogether with eye tracking technology, both hands stay on the keyboard then.
They have head tracking technology now, it’s just very imprecise compared to a mouse. Might be the same thing with eye tracking technology though, and for FPS might be too much like an aimbot if it could be developed to be very precise. So back to reality…
Thumb buttons that make sense: (the only one who has gotten this right so far is the stacked buttons on the Microsoft sidewinder).
Tilt wheels that you don’t accidentally activate when pressing mouses/scroll wheel.
for me it means more buttons on the mouse that i can actually use.
Eye tracking sounds cool, but what if I’m looking off somewhere, but want my crosshair to stay somewhere else? Guess I’ll have to wait for thought controlled games…