If (and here if is the keyword…) we accept his metaphor… then coding the features is the way I would consider the smarter, as species evolution wise the more diversity = the more stability, and again, if steam dies tomorrow, everyone is screwed, oh wai, not those programmer who didnt bet on steam, good bet!
Read again please, I never stated that splitting the community is the way to go, I stated that the choices SD made werent the better in my opinion, the alarming part to me is where you read beetween the lines and cant at least enounce my points clearly…
So while I get the reasons behind SD’s choice (copy/paste is idd faster and less ressource eater than coding the stuff) it doesnt disallow me to state that I dont think its the best way to go does it? And regarding the splitting community I guess I stated (maybe not enough times apparently…) that what’s done is done and I couldnt do anything to change the choice of distribution.
Now we can go on and on for pages here, but I guess each time I 'll say something many of you guys will read the first two lines and regurgitate the same answers as usual, if we cant have a civil discussion it’s not really my problem here.
Peace