ET: W:ET or ET:QW?

(nUllSkillZ) #1

Hi,

just a little suggestion:
Please use W:ET (or RTCW:ET) or ET:QW (or QW) in topics and in threads.

So everyone can clearly see which game you are talking about.

Thnx.

(kamikazee) #2

+1 for this idea.

(-SSF-Sage) #3

ET=W:ET
QW=ET:QW
RTCW=RTCW:ET

We would call them with the first of the pairs. I’m in habbit on calling wolfet ET so I will remain using it. :wink:

(kamikazee) #4

Ehr, RtCW = RtCW…

Also, QW can also mean QuakeWorld.

(-SSF-Sage) #5

Oops yeah. My mistake. You won’t find me talking about quakeworld. :lol:

(xro) #6

QW=QuakeWorld

(kamikazee) #7

People keep ignoring me… :frowning:

(moonShield) #8

qw = QuakeWorld ffs…

(Gringo) #9

What does WoW stand for :evil:

(Salteh) #10

RTCW:ET does not exist.
RtCW does, and W:ET does, but there is no RTCW:ET :stuck_out_tongue:

I agree on the QW = quakeworld thing btw!
:slight_smile:

(SCDS_reyalP) #11

Yet :smiley:

(Nail) #12

ahhh yes, Return to Castle Quake Territory can’t wait

:roll:

(pringles1942) #13

Wolfenstien: Enemy Terriory. I’d prefer that game over ETQW any day of the year. :slight_smile:

(89blitz) #14

If that was made there would be atleast one excuse.

“Quake wars is a copy of battlefeild!!”
I hate it when people say that :roll:

Edit: in this case they would say its a copy of UT2004 because of its vechile single player :expressionless: :expressionless:

(pringles1942) #15

no it isn’t! ETQW is more unique than BF2142 or any other one in the series.

(Boosted) #16

but its true :wink:
and BF2142 is so much better anyways.

(BaronBlabla) #17

For Wankel Onbegrijpelijk Wrattenspel.

It’s dutch… It generally means that WoW sucks, just my opinion.

Baron

(stealth6) #18

[quote=“Boosted”]

but its true :wink:
and BF2142 is so much better anyways.[/quote]

but wasn’t QW announced well before BF2142 and EA just rushed out a “modded” version of BF2 with futuristic setting in order to beat QW to release, thus fooling eveyone into thinking QW is a copy of BF2142 and not the other way around (seems to have worked) :banghead:[/quote]

(Boosted) #19

so…? :stuck_out_tongue:
BF2142 was out much earlier so i pretty much doubt this story is true.
even if it would be true Bf2142 is still better, cuz of a lot reasons.
i tried both, hated QW, loved BF but havent bought any of them (pc too weak, no money to upgrade/buy the game).

(kamikazee) #20

Well, there was no sign of BF2142 when ET:QW was announced… and suddenly, there it was having a pretty unstable open beta/demo and being released with most of that stuff intact.

Now, I don’t say you should like ET:QW over BF2142, because they are different games (although with similar themes) and as such can’t be copies.

However, it is a fact that ET:QW took longer to make and thus got more thought about game play. Also, I think it’s rare to find a design team which is so committed to its community like Splash Damage is. Did Dice release the game source? I thought not.