Why RedEye may be completely useless

(Jostabeere) #21

[quote=“god1;56823”]Just one console command to reduce a smoke grenade to a tiny ball like this.
http://imgur.com/a/FLx9s[/quote]
Now do this in a running game. Oh snap! :smile:

(god1) #22

[quote=“laudatoryLunch;56831”][quote=“god1;56823”]Just one console command to reduce a smoke grenade to a tiny ball like this.
http://imgur.com/a/FLx9s[/quote]
Now do this in a running game. Oh snap! :smile:
[/quote]
If Red Eye was playable, sure. That particular console command does work in live matches.

(RuleofBooKz) #23

glad i could help robustWonder by providing that wealth of information for your satisfaction.

next time i get called (should be in about 30 mins) “a bottom feeder piece of toxic forum filth that should be thrown out with the next trash pick up” i will be sure to mention that glowing testimonial you just did there

(robustWonder) #24

[quote=“RuleofBooKz;56834”]glad i could help robustWonder by providing that wealth of information for your satisfaction.

next time i get called (should be in about 30 mins) “a bottom feeder piece of toxic forum filth that should be thrown out with the next trash pick up” i will be sure to mention that glowing testimonial you just did there[/quote]

You actually helped a lot. I am not used to developers being strict about altering game files in shooters and worry a lot about wasting my time against people who do this (which was very common in APB).

I was worried the same issue would be prevalent in this game.

And I’ll still probably post asking about stupid exploits when I think of them.

(Jostabeere) #25

[quote=“god1;56832”][quote=“laudatoryLunch;56831”][quote=“god1;56823”]Just one console command to reduce a smoke grenade to a tiny ball like this.
http://imgur.com/a/FLx9s[/quote]
Now do this in a running game. Oh snap! :smile:
[/quote]
If Red Eye was playable, sure. That particular console command does work in live matches.
[/quote]

So you do believe SD will not disable this when he will be in-game?

(PurpleNurple) #26

I really wish the “know it all” people from APB would just go back to their forums and shit post there. If they said it’s been tested just shut up and wait for it to come out. The devs here aren’t idiots like the ones in APB.

(robustWonder) #27

Well these “know it all” people from APB include you who were already caught cheating in APB by FairFight according to your own words.

(RuleofBooKz) #28

dont worry robustWonder. ITs not nexon doing this game its splash damage. They are excellent devs (if u gloss over brink).

for me a bit of healthy paranoia and skepticism is okay. u will also learn who is who on these forums. Those who know and those who dont.

its usually the ones that dont know squat that try really hard to make everyone think otherwise.

PurpleNurple is ok tho. dont take it personal - it is / would be annoying having to defend a good game all the time right? There was that pay to win thing. Then the constant merc OP / not op thing, cheats and hackers, the list goes on and on. u would get annoyed if u supported a good game made by good devs and from all directions just came a bunch of poo

hard to kno genuine “i really want to kno” criticism and inquiry from the noobs who cant educate themselves cause they dont kno what “noob” is

(robustWonder) #29

[quote=“RuleofBooKz;56859”]dont worry robustWonder. ITs not nexon doing this game its splash damage. They are excellent devs (if u gloss over brink).

for me a bit of healthy paranoia and skepticism is okay. u will also learn who is who on these forums. Those who know and those who dont.

its usually the ones that dont know squat that try really hard to make everyone think otherwise.

PurpleNurple is ok tho. dont take it personal - it is / would be annoying having to defend a good game all the time right? There was that pay to win thing. Then the constant merc OP / not op thing, cheats and hackers, the list goes on and on. u would get annoyed if u supported a good game made by good devs and from all directions just came a bunch of poo

hard to kno genuine “i really want to kno” criticism and inquiry from the noobs who cant educate themselves cause they dont kno what “noob” is[/quote]

what was the pay to in issue about? I can’t find anything on the forums about it.

(RuleofBooKz) #30

for a time the game got a bit of a “pay to win” rep online for various reason but perhaps cause some silly youtube review types didnt understand how loadouts worked and so reported the game as “pay to win”

it was a bit of a sensation but is hopefully now behind us

(Hadouken) #31

Bookz has a following of down vote bots or what?

(RuleofBooKz) #32

haha yes. you know how these kids are - u disagree with them in one thread then for the next week they will follow you into every thread and just “dislike” anything you post. Because, reasons?

just ignore them - i do

(cornJester) #33

[quote=“RuleofBooKz;56894”]haha yes. you know how these kids are - u disagree with them in one thread then for the next week they will follow you into every thread and just “dislike” anything you post. Because, reasons?

just ignore them - i do[/quote]

<3 Only returning the love for the 58 dislikes (in a row) and then up to 109 dislikes from you.

(srswizard) #34

Nah, people just wish that Bookz didn’t post at all, but he won’t take the hint.

(Nail) #35

there are a few wannabe thugstars infesting these forums, I got some too, there’s always a temptation to fight back, but I guess it makes them feel like “heros” fighting the bad guys, gives them some sort of internet self esteem. Maybe it helps their delicate egos

(robustWonder) #36

there are a few wannabe thugstars infesting these forums, I got some too, there’s always a temptation to fight back, but I guess it makes them feel like “heros” fighting the bad guys, gives them some sort of internet self esteem. Maybe it helps their delicate egos[/quote]

When your only feedback from humans is the internet… yeah people tend to care way too much about what some random that they will never meet writes.

(Jostabeere) #37

Jup. People tend to thinking: “He disliked me one time, he’s a dick and I have to dislike everything of him”. Sure, @RuleofBooKz is writing nonsense here and there, but many times his posts are good. Too bad butt-hurted kids will dislike him anyway, cause “forget post-quality, it’s from that guy who disliked my total-awesome idea!!!11”

(cornJester) #38

Nah. BooKz actually did that first. I disliked a few posts of his in a row, come back to find he had disliked 58 of mine in a row after that. At that point I was just having a bit of fun seeing how far it would go. We disliked the crap out of each other, was no one way thing. Neither of us are innocent or mature. A little immature dislike war, all it was. Unfortunately he seems to be playing it one sided. EDIT: We’ve removed each other’s dislikes btw.

TL;DR Drama

(VincentRJaeger) #39

" @RuleofBookz is the hero the Forum deserves, but not the one it needs right now. So we’ll hunt him. Because he can take it. Because he’s not our hero. He’s a silent guardian, a watchful protector. A dark mercenary."

(Jostabeere) #40

Nah. BooKz actually did that first. I disliked a few posts of his in a row, come back to find he had disliked 58 of mine in a row after that. At that point I was just having a bit of fun seeing how far it would go. We disliked the crap out of each other, was no one way thing. Neither of us are innocent or mature. A little immature dislike war, all it was. Unfortunately he seems to be playing it one sided.

TL;DR Drama[/quote]
So instead of mailing an Admin or MissMurder you disliked a crapton of his posts? And I thought I got an ass-full of free time!