trusted Player against HAX!

(abnorm) #1

Playing with cheater kills any fun in DirtyBomb. There are no servers hosted by the community. So we dont have any admin playing. Thats sad because on servers with admins there is a clean playing going. What´s about to have a kind of “trusted players”. And give them the power to KICK. That would help to clean up.

(spookify) #2

I have only seen one blatant haxer in 2 months and that was in a Ranked MM game.

It scares the crap out of me that some “trusted” player can kick someone. People try to kick me based on my level alone!

(Rémy Cabresin) #3

[QUOTE=spookify;542369]I have only seen one blatant haxer in 2 months and that was in a Ranked MM game.

It scares the crap out of me that some “trusted” player can kick someone. People try to kick me based on my level alone![/QUOTE]

Thats why trusted players though, high level players with preferably a history in the anticheat field(admins from torunaments etc). And give them kick rights only so no banning, but if they kick someone it automatically flags that player to Nexon/SD and they can do appropiate actions from there.

(abnorm) #4

[QUOTE=spookify;542369]I have only seen one blatant haxer in 2 months and that was in a Ranked MM game.

It scares the crap out of me that some “trusted” player can kick someone. People try to kick me based on my level alone![/QUOTE]

Thats the reason only player with background can do that job and no nonames. you could be an trusted player.
Had the idea because a kid was turning an aimbot on because of losing hard in MM. I would love to kick him out. vote kick is not cleaning up imho.

(Destroy666) #5

I wouldn’t want a random “trusted” high level guy to be able to kick me on a random public server… Community servers are so much better because then you have a choice to avoid poorly managed servers.

(Szakalot) #6

since new anti cheat I barely ever see hackers anymore.

(Apples) #7

Need some specs and tools first, I see some pretty accurate preshots thru wall when non detected lately, and with the lol footsteps we have, it seems uber suspicious, but I wont point the finger without proofs, so give us the tools to collect proofs…

(Rémy Cabresin) #8

You’re putting random and trusted to describe the same person. That doesn’t even make sense :stuck_out_tongue: If they are trusted they are probably not random people but people with a lot of hours and specific reasons as to why they would get trusted accounts.

(Szakalot) #9

they are trusted by some, and random to others.

I also don’t want ‘trusted’ people to have kick power on pub servers

(abnorm) #10

[QUOTE=Szakalot;542404]they are trusted by some, and random to others.

I also don’t want ‘trusted’ people to have kick power on pub servers[/QUOTE]

If there is a hax player on public, I just join spec or I leave, but whats on MM? You get a penaltiy when you leave. So you have to suffer to the end…sux

(Szakalot) #11

i have seen like one blatant hacker and one player i was suspicious about since NGS release.

You can always go afk in MM and refuse to spawn; yeah it sux, but it would sux to get kicked by a ‘trustee’ cause they got rekked, too.

(abnorm) #12

[QUOTE=Szakalot;542406]i have seen like one blatant hacker and one player i was suspicious about since NGS release.

You can always go afk in MM and refuse to spawn; yeah it sux, but it would sux to get kicked by a ‘trustee’ cause they got rekked, too.[/QUOTE]

Yesterday I had the pleasure to play against an aimbotter, so NGS is not avoid this. Ofc I stoped playing. It would be nice to join spectator mode in MM. Surrender vote didnt work when you have a random team.

(Szakalot) #13

you made this yesterday. is it the first aimbot you have seensince NGS?

(abnorm) #14

hmmm. that was the 3rd or 4th since NGS with obviously cheats running.

(Glottis-3D) #15
  1. spec in MM is a must.
  2. when obvious cheat is in game, ppl call one of these trusted guys.(call vote of direct invite)
  3. trusted guy joins, specs, records proof.
  4. trusted guy disband the game, and file a report on cheater.
  5. report is directly connected to a disbanned game - if player IS NOT a cheater then trusted guy made a mistake. second mistake and he is not trusted anymore.

so noone can abuse this - the game disbands, no one gets advantage, trusted guy will not report legit players on purpuse (2 mistakes rule).

(abnorm) #16

[QUOTE=Glottis-3D;542415]1. spec in MM is a must.
2. when obvious cheat is in game, ppl call one of these trusted guys.(call vote of direct invite)
3. trusted guy joins, specs, records proof.
4. trusted guy disband the game, and file a report on cheater.
5. report is directly connected to a disbanned game - if player IS NOT a cheater then trusted guy made a mistake. second mistake and he is not trusted anymore.

so noone can abuse this - the game disbands, no one gets advantage, trusted guy will not report legit players on purpuse (2 mistakes rule).[/QUOTE]

I like this idea ^^

(Glottis-3D) #17
  1. spec slot is for trusted guy/referee only, and he joins the game invisibly as a referee. so that cheater doesnt know that he joins.

there should be some UI for referee to make all this stuff quickly.

(Rémy Cabresin) #18

the problem here is that it’s near impossible to do this unless you pay these trusted people. If someone as to be available 24/7 it turns into a job opposed to having people being active at anticheating as they play. Which means SD/Nexon has to pull out more money to support this. We already have people who have similar functions working at SD called GM’s who handle reports etc and if they can on the fly ban people live, but they are paid positions.

(Glottis-3D) #19

they, or NGS are doing a good job. much much less cheaters now, than in spring.

(Destroy666) #20

Exactly… SD may trust other people than I do, you know. Even if they are not random for me and I know them somehow, it still may be unsafe when their Steam accounts get stolen or whatever.