After I made the comparison now, I prefer Fraps because it is much sharper. Sure you need a supercomputer to record with it, but I would say renderNetDemo or Fraps depends on your personal taste. Colours can be set by any video editing program anyway.
renderNetDemo - professionals needed
Dthy
(Dthy)
#22
I always use Fraps because it’s quicker and easier to use imo. Even though the videos get slightly saturated, it’s nothing a simply colour correction can’t solve 
Ashog
(Ashog)
#24
If you need advises on rendering with fraps and from fraps, custom hud or video cfg - let me know.
king_troll
(king_troll)
#25
fraps is better, it just needs a compression option, so you dont need a tb drive to a 20 min movie, you just have to play back your demo and record it with fraps. then trim the avi using virtualdub
king_troll
(king_troll)
#27
[QUOTE=Rex;383360]It has no compression option so you need a huge harddrive.
ORLY Captain obvious?[/QUOTE]
yup, if fraps had the option of choosing the video and autio codec from OS installed droplist like most applications do, then a HD 4 min vid will not need a tb drive to save the uncompressed avi, or just a normal vid that lasts 30mins and on,
saving movies as xvid with mp3 audio would be alot better, and if you dont mind loosing 1 or 2 fps, and live compress games, you can record most of the night without running out of space on your drive
and yup, you just have to play back your demo file, and record the screen using fraps
Donnovan
(Donnovan)
#28
The Fraps format is not plain Uncompressed file. It have compression. You also can see the Fraps decoder on the codecs list, its used to decode Fraps generated video.