Well, no. I have a vested heterosexual interest in the Doctor being a dude.
Not the new one though. I wish they’d chosen the actor who played Billy in Blink. 
And it’s hardly an industry standard. It’s a tv show. Plenty of tv shows with female leads. Too bad Eastwick was cancelled though.
[QUOTE=Exedore;206081]As another person who ‘boycotts’ all sorts of products and companies based on strange things called ‘principles’, don’t sell yourself short.
Thanks for expressing your views so intelligently and staying above some of the lows this thread has sunk to, it’s where any meaningful change starts. I see middleware as a potential solution for this annoying game industry problem, but nobody is going to think of that as a viable venture unless people are vocal about demanding change.[/QUOTE]
nod I figure the industry will evolve to be more chick-friendly as time goes on. After all, if they can figure out how to get more women to buy their games, it’ll likely mean more sales. I’m just trying to hurry it along, however miniscule my effort is. XD
http://bookclubs.barnesandnoble.com/t5/Unabashedly-Bookish/New-Romance-Video-Game-Boon-to-Gamers-Parents-Everywhere/bc-p/432673
^^^— That is not going to end well. >_< And it’s yet another reason why I want chicks to be seen as potential customers by the industry instead of a segregated system where women are herded toward playing Wii Fit and romance casual games. Those games suck.
A friend of mine didn’t buy a PS3 until she started playing littleBIGplanet with me. Now her husband has a dozen games for the system, and they sometimes argue over who gets to use the thing.
Before that, she hadn’t played any game except The Sims (which is a game in which customization is pretty much the whole point).
Anyway, I do want to play Brink. The free-running aspect introduced into an FPS/RPG game will probably be awesome.
[QUOTE=signofzeta;206092]
And I see that profane still didn’t understand the deeper meaning in my viking post. And to be really vocal about the female avatar thing, one must actually do work to voice their opinion, and not simply a boycott and a forum post. How do you think women’s rights activists got what they wanted? By posting in forum, and not living in certain countries?[/quote]
There was deeper meaning than rape fantasy? Cool. What does where I live have to do with video games? O_o To top it off, women’s rights is a very different thing than what I’m asking for.
I’m not, contrary to what you may think, looking for equality in my video games. I’m looking for maximum enjoyment. The fact that it means I’m demanding female mods for a better immersive experience and to further an idea that both genders like video games (and that female gamers shouldn’t be seen as a rarity to be hit on and harassed in online gaming) is just about wanting better quality out of whatever I buy.
For instance, I rarely shop at Amazon.com anymore. It used to be where I spent a few hundred dollars a year on books alone. But because they deliberately slow down processing on orders using free shipping, I’ve switched to shopping at Borders. So they’ve lost a customer for asshatery. If I feel that a business isn’t doing its best to attract and keep me as a customer, then I assume, rightly, that they don’t need my patronage.
This means in Brink terms (and other games) that a lack of female mods implies that the female gamer is an unimportant customer. Or at least not as important as male customers. I can take my money elsewhere because they don’t need it. And currently, that’s not far off the mark. Female gamers and potential gamers are an afterthought in the industry, if that.
I’m not implying deliberate sexism. Like I’ve said before, stereotypes about what females (women and girls) like to do vs. what males like to do (ie, chicks don’t play video games) and the sheer lack of marketing towards women produces a market where men ARE the vast majority of customers. Ergo, a company has more interest (at the moment) in keeping and attracting male gamers than females. We are an afterthought not because women don’t matter PERIOD, but because of current stereotypes and market influences.
So I’m still standing by my boycott because I want every game I buy to be the best gaming experience I can have.
Converting people who hated having female avatars in games to having them, already shows you have power, and that also would convince Splash Damage of change. Right now, none of us are converted yet.
Why do people with picket signs prowl the streets? And when you see such people with picket signs, how many people are there?
How did you think the FLQ crisis happened? By French-Canadians not living in Canada, and whining in forum posts saying that Quebec should be a separate country?
And the whole terrorism thing. If terrorists were like profane, the world would be more peaceful. They are going to go to forums posting how much they hate americans, and they are not even remotely going to step foot in american soil, and fly into american airspace.
Uh…generally speaking, video games are part of a mass market. There isn’t, to my knowledge, a “headquarters” for the video game industry. So where would I picket? And why would a passing stranger, one who probably doesn’t play video games at all, care? On the other hand, a forum post where other gamers and people who work in the industry participate incites discussion, and even if the discussion goes against my arguments, it’s still discussion with people who do have a vested interest in video games.
If terrorists were like me, sweetie, they’d wouldn’t try blowing up planes by sticking bombs in their panties.
In fact, terrorism would be pretty ineffectual if it weren’t for our media sending out panic signals to every corner of the country, as if we’re all in eminent danger of being killed by an extremist. So what you’re really saying is, I should get the media all fired up about how a lack of female mods in video games diminishes gaming experiences for many female gamers? Yeeah.