Reality in the face !

(dazman76) #61

Yeah, very impressive work - watched the VJ Reel too :slight_smile: Nice!

(BomBaKlaK) #62

yep thx :wink:

Back to our purpose ! that dam unfinished beta game with only 8 maps and a lot of bugs for 50 box

(BomBaKlaK) #63

so if you look closer to the maps winners stats on console cause we still dont have the PC stats …

container city : resistance 78% security 22%
security tower : Resistance 24% security 76%

and really strange but reactor and resort are close to the 50/50 on console really want to see the pc stats to know if that the same on pc.

(BomBaKlaK) #64

now it’s absolutly amazing ! to find a server full it’s really hard …
online 532 peak 1,077
sad reality !

that the last chance chance with your DLC fix

we Need some amazing stuff
need more than 2 maps and some fix , for revive a little bit this game …

(Tandem) #65

[QUOTE=BomBaKlaK;343434]now it’s absolutly amazing ! to find a server full it’s really hard …
online 532 peak 1,077
sad reality ! [/QUOTE]

That’s pretty good for a beta. (in reality)

Can’t wait for full game.
=]

(BomBaKlaK) #66

just a bit expensive beta …
but yes indeed ! :stuck_out_tongue:

(its al bout security) #67

ha ha very funny muther Focker
-ie Samuel l Jackson

the game isnt a beta .___.

i like it mself and so do the 60 brink players on my friends list go somewhere.

(BomBaKlaK) #68

So we dont have the same vision of a finished product …

(its al bout security) #69

the game is a complete product, its just slightly defective, needs some modifications to work at 100%.

the mechanics are are there, gameplay wise it just needs finer tuning twards the menus and glitches and such.

(legend123) #70

@ topic creator i feel your pain.

soon the peak will be 1000 people (which is when I consider a game dead considering it started with 17000).

its a good game even with its countless mistakes that need fixing. I have around 150 hrs.

but for now I have stopped until fps issues are sorted. 20-40 fps is just not playable.

if you want to compete with the best players you need higher fps.

(its al bout security) #71

[QUOTE=legend123;343513]@ topic creator i feel your pain.

soon the peak will be 1000 people (which is when I consider a game dead considering it started with 17000).

its a good game even with its countless mistakes that need fixing. I have around 150 hrs.

but for now I have stopped until fps issues are sorted. 20-40 fps is just not playable.

if you want to compete with the best players you need higher fps.[/QUOTE]

need nvidia drivers till the open GL is fixed.

ATI cards are more prevalent but nvidia is much more powerful than its ever been and its not making sense that they are the underdogs anymore.

(riptide) #72

[QUOTE=its al bout security;343516]

ATI cards are more prevalent but nvidia is much more powerful than its ever been and its not making sense that they are the underdogs anymore.[/QUOTE]

lol.
10chars

(legend123) #73

[QUOTE=Tandem;343472]That’s pretty good for a beta. (in reality)

Can’t wait for full game.
=][/QUOTE]

Haha.Good one :D:penguin:

(its al bout security) #74

[QUOTE=riptide;343517]lol.
10chars[/QUOTE]

whhaaa?? not makn sense

(light_sh4v0r) #75

Exactly, you seem to have no clue whatsoever. Nvidia underdog?

I bought a game 1 month ago and paid €45,- for it. I have been unable to play it properly ever since. But other than that it’s a complete product.

(Gradis) #76

urgh urgh urgh

my 10 downed

(kilL_888) #77

i recently learned that nvidia has a much better program for developers, called “the way its meant to be played”. they give better support for devs and they do that for quite some time now.

ati on the other hand also has a program to support devs, but its very young and they are not as experienced with it as nvidia is.

nvidia also gives a lot of hardware to devs to optimize their games, while ati on the other hand does not. at least not in the range nvidia is doing.

are a gamer? go for nvidia. thats my conclusion from the last month. screw the price. ati is cheaper with most of their products for bringing almost the same performance. thats the reason i bought my card actually. now i see where it got me.

(cheezespread) #78

[QUOTE=its al bout security;343512]the game is a complete product, its just slightly defective, needs some modifications to work at 100%.

the mechanics are are there, gameplay wise it just needs finer tuning twards the menus and glitches and such.[/QUOTE]

Complete product - Cannot agree one bit on that.

[ul]
[li]How do you release a game one week in advance with flaws like " no sound for a map " ?[/li][li]Did anyone test these on ATI cards ? - There is a concept called equivalence partitioning & boundary value analysis in testing. When I would mention a system requirement , i would expect that to be tested in a machine which fits that criteria.Not all the fault is the developers since the game works very well onNvidia cards.[/li][li]Seamless integration of MP/SP : They should drop that word and rephrase it as training.[/li][li]What is the use of body types when you can’t switch them in game ?[/li][/ul]

I have been vouching for this game a lot and its time i accept the flaws. I know people from the community have gone back to ETQW after a month of BRINK.And I ( painfully) am thinking of the same option.

Going back to testing