Rate Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory. Points 1-5. 1 = the worst 2 = the best.
EDIT: Oops! I meant 5 is the best.
Rate Wolfenstein - Enemy Territory. Points 1-5. 1 = the worst 2 = the best.
EDIT: Oops! I meant 5 is the best.
What’s this???
Everywhere 1 means good and 5 (or 6) bad.
Why other way around?
ET is the best I’ve played so far.
I think pure DM / TDM isn’t that addictive.
And people without aiming skill can have success (for example complete objectives, best XXX and so on).
Definetly 5.
Maybe in Germany… In pretty much every rating system I’ve seen a higher numbers means better… 
I’ve seen both, but then again, that’s why you have to specifiy which is best and which is worst.
Relativity?
I could vote which is better out of RtCW or ET, or tell you how good the MP is compared to other MP games, but just “rate it”? Hmmm. Graphically it’s miles behind Doom3, the Single-Player experience is worse than every other game simply because it doesn’t exist, so it really depends what you’re comparing it to when you’re rating here. Just saying 1-5 is meaningless on its own.
But I guess I’ll vote 5 and make life easier.
A bit pointless to start such a vote on a ET forum, hmm? 
So, just for the diversity: 1, the worst I’ve ever played, horrible gameplay, ugly graphics, even pong looks better, ridiculously unrealistic storyline…
I am only playing it daily since open beta because I am a masochist 
:moo: