How is it non-sensical? Here is a FACT. Phantom is classified, by splash damage, as RECON. So you have to find something IN COMMON with ALL the recon classes, and yes, that includes Phantom, and that something is what makes a recon class a recon. A new recon class can have no spotting abilities, but have the abilities to convert enemy deployables into friendly ones, or ability to slow down an EV or increase the time for a C4 to blow. That is sabotage. Recons aren’t only about spotting. They are also about infiltrating and sabotage as well. It’s just that they aren’t done at the same time.
As I said, you made assumptions first, and you fit the mercs into these assumptions. Splash Damage didn’t classify only on properties of abilties. You did, and your assumptions are wrong. If Splash Damage did classify by ability, Phantom would officially be an assault, not a recon. Now back to reality. Phantom is a recon. You assumed that all Recon mercs can spot and you pretended like Phantom wasn’t a recon merc, which isn’t true. I use what is factually true, the fact that Splash Damage classifies Phantom as a recon merc, and find something in common between Phantom, Vasili, and Redeye. Majority doesn’t cut it. You need to find something in common with ALL the mercs without pretending something did or didn’t happen.
As I said, any class can kill. Your definition of assault is killers who are useless at something else. That’s true, but there are other features that they have, like the fact that they carry heavy weapons.
The way you classify the mercs isn’t the way Splash Damage classifies the mercs. Your way is proven false because Splash Damage classified Phantom as a Recon and you classify recon mercs as having the ability to spot, and Phantom can’t spot, so the ability to spot isn’t what makes a merc a recon merc. Just think about it. Is Vasili’s job primarily to use heartbeat sensor or to snipe? Do you keep on chucking heartbeat sensors every time, or do you spend more time sniping? Vasili is named after a Russian sniper, so he is knowing for his sniping more than his spotting. His spotting ability is secondary. What makes a recon merc the way they are is to give the enemies fear of not knowing where you will strike, because you can see them but they can’t see you.
Here is a fact. I played Wolf ET, ETQW, Brink, and Dirty Bomb. I pretty much tried out every class except stoker. Comparing Wolf ET to Dirty Bomb, when I played with assault mercs, they feel exactly like the Soldier in ET. Medics felt like medics, Engineers felt like engineers, and Fire support felt like field ops, and Recon mercs felt like Covert Ops in ET. When I play as a phantom, the same style I use when I play ET can only be effective when I play as a Covert Ops, not the Soldier. You can deny all you want, but the mercs of a certain class match the description of what Wolf ET describes for that class.
You can’t pretend that Phantom is an Assault, and you can’t pretend that Wolf ET didn’t have any effect on Splash Damage’s decision on how to classify the mercs.
How about getting out of the Dirty Bomb mentality and get into the Splash Damage mentality. They were the ones who classified Phantom as Recon. Now me, I am only using facts and reality and not pretending that something should be this and that and acting as if it were reality.
Now I wish Phantom had an ability that would make him more of a recon than he already is, but the fact of the matter is, he doesn’t need a spotting ability to be a recon merc. What makes a recon merc a recon merc is if it fits some of the description of the ET covert ops, ETQW covert ops, or Brink Operative class, but none of the description of the other classes in those respective games.