I thought the caps would have been on “I’ve nothing to add”, and a lot of people prefers to add “10chars” two line below to explain this protection limit 
Maybe if he had said “Nice work, keep it going, can’t wait for it!”, there would have been a different reaction But the “nothing to add” may be understood like “everything has been already said from the others’ posts”.
Am I wrong? x)
[QUOTE=Mateos;394137]I thought the caps would have been on “I’ve nothing to add”, and a lot of people prefers to add “10chars” two line below to explain this protection limit
Maybe if he had said “Nice work, keep it going, can’t wait for it!”, there would have been a different reaction But the “nothing to add” may be understood like “everything has been already said from the others’ posts”.
Am I wrong? x)[/QUOTE]
It was my first post in this topic I was just saying my hello, I had read the previous posts and have nothing to say apart from saying to the creators that I think they’ve done really good work! When I posted it I was being optimistic and excited at this project, the good work was like, OH WOW GOOD WORK, capitals the way I expressed my feelings ;).
Have I caused some trouble or something here? lol
I am really sorry for prolonging this hugely off-topic conversation, but now I finally understand why you all made such a fuss about my dots:
:D:D:D
OK guys, little update
Finished so far :
Fully fixed Newton physics inside OpenWolf
[ul]
Maybe in some next release I will move all that inside qagame.
[/ul]
Increased “sv_fps” to 60
[ul]
Because of Newton Dynamics calculation
[/ul]
Fixed problems with map entities
[ul]
Now you cannot move over and in map entities (like boxes, tanks … ). That was really annoying bug for me
[/ul]
Some mathematical functions was badly written
Major code cleaning and reformatting
Fixed Sys_PrintOSInfo
[ul]
Now it is fully recognizing Windows, and you cannot run game on pre Windows XP system
[/ul][B]
Added Microsoft XBoX 360 controller support for ET UI
New UI Icons and code for Xbox 360 controller
New keyboard icons for UI
Re-added experimental “Hello World” Direct3D 10 renderer for Windows platform[/B]
[ul]
Don’t expect too much from D3D renderer at this time, it’s just “Hello World” test
[/ul][B]
Fixed problems with corrupt official pak file
Fixed problems checksum calculation of pk3 files
Fixed stencil shadows inside ET vanilla renderer.
Fixed Visual Studio solution configurations
Separated MySQL connection for Master and Slave server
More work on MySQL stuff inside GPP
Re-wrote part of XreaL renderer because license problems with using GPL v3 code inside GPL v2[/B]
[ul]
I don’t know about you[reader], but I really serious understand licenses, and that was really problem to have that inside codebase
[/ul][B]
Fixed surface flags inside renderers and game logic(s)
Fixed OWMap
Re-writed Sys_DefaultHomePath[/B]
[ul]
Now default home folder is located inside (My Documents\My Games\OpenWolf)
[/ul]
Added more detail crash information for Windows platforms
[ul]
Game will not create additional folder Bugs inside (My Documents\My Games\OpenWolf) and post there additional crash information files, what you can start inside Visual Studio 2010 and debug yourself crash
[/ul][B]
Changed VS both release builds (Win32 and Win64) to generate symbols which you can use if crash happends
Fixed wwwdl exploit
Fixed “ws 999…” server crash
Fixed tcGen Lightmap and light styles inside XreaL renderer
Added possibility that engine recognize your GPU automatically and set renderer according to supported OpenGL extensions[/B]
[ul]
Example, if your GPU is supporting only OpenGL 1.1, game on start will set “cl_renderer” cvar automatically to “GL” and load ET vanilla renderer
[/ul]Currenty working :
[B]
VBO adding for ET vanilla renderer[/B]
Sadly this BBCode isn’t the one which SD forums uses it seems 
Nice changes! Would like to test it o.o
I will provide SOON ™ some testing build, but just to warn people on some things.
Like I told, it’s testing build and SOON™
He means you need to make it GPL if I read correctly. So yes, a kind of open source (you need to make code available for everyone and they’re able to make new modifications out of it under GPL license too).
i believe i asked this question before, but it hasn’t been answered.
any plans on adding stereoscopic support? 3D vision, or side by side?
[QUOTE=IndyJones;395659]i believe i asked this question before, but it hasn’t been answered.
any plans on adding stereoscopic support? 3D vision, or side by side?[/QUOTE]
Not for now here. I really believe that its only good to have and that only few people will use it.
Btw. This is my latest work atm 
UI menu’s and fonts in-game are still ugly and looking like crap.
Support for Dual displays in fullscreen is also working. (Just I code and test game like its shown in screenshots). You can move game from display to display with new cvar
Just one problem with fulscreen and dual displays. If one of your monitor have bigger resolution then other, game will set lowest r_mode settings for both displays.
once stereo is implemented, a lot of people will try it… just to find it what is it like. those who dont’ have vision problem will enjoy 3D
once you try 3D mode, you don’t want to go back to 2D… at least i dont.
playing battlefield 3 with 3D vision and sony hmz-t1 is one big experience!
If the code was respected and not abused or anything like it, I would agree with you!
[QUOTE=IndyJones;395693]once stereo is implemented, a lot of people will try it… just to find it what is it like. those who dont’ have vision problem will enjoy 3D
once you try 3D mode, you don’t want to go back to 2D… at least i dont.
playing battlefield 3 with 3D vision and sony hmz-t1 is one big experience!
[/QUOTE]
I don’t think I could play as much as I do with that thing on my head, or is it comfortable?
abuse code?
Abuse is perhaps wrong word. What I mean is that people take codes or base a mod on a open source project, add maybe one to three new features, rename it and then release as a own new project. I just don’t think that is right. Why not keep developing the “main” source.
[QUOTE=Shownie;395705]Abuse is perhaps wrong word. What I mean is that people take codes or base a mod on a open source project, add maybe one to three new features, rename it and then release as a own new project. I just don’t think that is right. Why not keep developing the “main” source.
:)[/QUOTE]
