tbh its a bit odd reading games mags, they dont half seem to get an awful lot… well “wrong” would be harsh but er lets say its painfully obvious they only have a few people and a whole lot of games to cover. Even worse when they do the hardware stuff, saying things completely at odds to what you’ll find the consensus is on dedicated hardware sites, and even laughable bias that you can easily mess up the spelling and add a 12-year old mentality and come up with “intel r teh bestest amd suck tey r only 2gigahurtz and crash get viruses and melt when tey get hot” oh and suddenly why you shouldnt bother building your own and just go buy a pre-made PC from somewhere like, say, Alienware™…
Yeah I’ve noticed PcGamer and PCzone seem to almost studiously ignore RTCW and ET, and even quake gets talked about like its some thing, rather than a game they actually play all the time. Actually only gaming mag I remember as being good was Edge, and for a period CVG. FWIW, last issue I got of PCGamer (UK) said they were changin it a lot and seem to be going mroe towards quality writing and game-experience etc, which sounds a fair bit better. Also, if you ask them to put stuff on the disks they often will, and this might draw their attention to write about it aswell (if just “on the disks” pages)
If you want even more asinine, MS wont let the mags put OS patches - or even directx unless its part of a demo - onto the disks.