[QUOTE=madness;271545]yea…without leaderboards the game will suck for sure. it’s a given. 100% every game needs leaderboards to succeed
:rolleyes:[/QUOTE]
Leaderboards provide a yardstick against which you can measure your progress. This is an important feedback mechanism. Many people are happy with just winning the current game they are playing. Some prefer to try to get better and better and want to track their progress over time.
I think for Brink, any leaderboard should be a clan-based leaderboard. You would register for a clan and anytime you (as a group) wanted to play a ranked match, you would all queue up like in an RTS game and it would assign you an opposing clan to play against. This would allow for a leaderboard fit to the team-based nature of the game.
Alas, that is a lot of work for which I cannot claim you will sell a lot more copies.
Maybe if that’s not feasable (not enough full teams matching simultaneously?), it could adjust your points for every victory/loss your clan completes as a team. If only a fraction of your clan is playing in the game, you would only get a fraction of the points. So if 6/8 players are all in the same clan and they lose, they will lose some points on the ladder. If only 3/8 players on the team are from the same clan, their clan loses fewer points. Same for if you win. The more of your team which is from your clan, the more credit you are given for it’s victory/loss.
I’m sure this kind of system could be worked out so it wouldn’t be exploitable and could accurately track the best clans out there. Some kind of random matching system would have to be used though.