[quote=“onLooSe;209509”]@amerika* Even so, this has nothing to do with his idea to put DB behind a paywall.
Also, almost everyone was using QL Prism either way, which was regularly updated… This has nothing to do with the topic and the only reason I gave it as an example was the fact that the playerbase dropped more than 3x times after they’ve done that. This conversation is really pointless…[/quote]
You used Quake Live show how DB would turn out while completely making up information that fit your argument so I am confused by your, “this has nothing to do with his idea to put DB behind a paywall.”. Being accurate when using examples of how DB behind a paywall would fail is pretty relevant to that particular conversation.
There are a lot of reasons why Quake Live numbers dropped which include it not being f2p anymore (despite virtually all players getting it for free who had played), losing all your years of stats, your clan lists, your way of interacting with players via favorite servers and friends lists. The loss of the ability quickly fire up servers when needed. And all of this happening in a very small amount of time.
Instead of taking the game offline, iD made it a cheap pay title while giving everyone who had played a copy. If DB ever gets in the same situation where it costs too much money to keep servers up I would love for it to become a pay title, give us some server files and patch it so it can run as a stand-alone game. You’d lose numbers but a lot of the hardcore would remain which could make it a more consistent experience. Not what I want to see but it’s not a bad way to turn out. Quake Live is still kicking despite losing all the fair-weather/f2p warriors.