[QUOTE=zenstar;410283]Mercs are “toughguys” ™. They don’t wear protection when they don’t have to, and they tend to have a much lower life expectancy anyway so why worry about some future cancer? If they really cared about long term effects on their health you wouldn’t find so many chewing on the end of a stogie!
Also: government reaction would be for the overall good of the people (and by that I mean their wallets). An increase of 1% chance to get cancer is a massive cost to the NHS so to minimise potential loss of expense fraud money they’d evacuate the city and put up a restricted zone which would be patrolled but the security would be lax (probably because it’d be handled by G4S or something) and mercs could sneak through to pillage data cores.
In reality: I read an article about a woman who rode her motorbike through the areas around Chernobyl with no more protection than a normal biker has and all she had to do was take a shower afterwards. As long as you stay in the middle of the roads the rad levels are very low. All the radiation is stuck in the plant life. Paving and asphalt don’t hold radiation too long. So as long as we’re not shooting each other in the parks then the risk is pretty low for short stints.[/QUOTE]
Yet there would be a huge cost to moving 8 million people? Shutting down all business within London? I’m not sure a small increased risk of cancer and resulting treatment would touch on any of those costs.
Okay, wild animals then. Wild animals with 3 eyes! 


