His point seemed to be that the D3 engine is old and it didn’t run well for him, so in fact the D3 engine is a pos that will ruin Quake Wars.
Sounds more like a cry and whine rant rather than a true article. You could make a case for retiring the D3 engine, but I don’t think anyone will take him seriously. Run-on and confusing sentences, spelling errors, and only his experience as facts isn’t very compelling.
I can’t believe a comment said his article was ‘written well’.
Obviously that piece is filled mostly with bizzare comparisons and incoherent rambeling unsupported by facts.
I think it was actualy ment to be more like a cry for attention than a serious critic. Which is exactly why we shouldn’t talk about it anymore.
TBH, that is not even worth reading.
@Theophany(the author),
Maybe you would be better off writing reviews about fast food.
This is weird. igl joined back in june 2006 yet he has only 4 posts. And after six moths the 4th post is:
Good to have you back 
He doesnt really know what hes talking about…
He said that the d3 engine doesnt feel like a game should^^. I stopped reading @ this line.
Don’t feel bad. My first-person shooter was G.I. Joe with the kung-fu grip in my frontyard. (I’m 45)
Slippy the Weasel
I think writer’s problem isn’t D3 engine. He rejected ET:QW becouse it isn’t situated in WW2… and he isn’t able to take i think and explain his REAL reasons why he rejected ET:QW.