Are you going to support other platforms?

(Gringo) #21

2+2 is 4, 2+2 is 4, 2+2 is 4

(ParanoiD) #22

Nope 2+2=4. = means equale to. So 2+2 is equal to 4 and not 2+2 is 4.

(Gringo) #23

Hey dont tell me, tell barney smartarse

:wink: :wink:

(ayatollah) #24

Hace to say I laughed when reading this on the EA forum

Thats how EA sell games, by preaching to the ignorant masses!

(nate_6009) #25

Joe999 wrote:

NO, PLEASE DON’T!!! i’ve just downloaded the GRAW demo from the marketplace: several bugs so i couldn’t join a game for a while. after 10 minutes i got into a server and what was? i couldn’t even spectate, i had to wait until the round finished. 4 minutes!!! i thought i’d try. then after 4 minutes everoyne was ready except the server admin. what happened? he shut the server down. another 5 minutes to find a server. then i could luckily join, experienced what a crap the control with a gamepad is and quit the game.

then i downloaded the BF2 demo from the marketplace and man this sucks - in all ways, even in high definition. i won’t play a first person shooter anymore on a console, you can’t even turn around when someone shoots at you. besides BF2 is sniper heaven. you walk and bang, you’re dead. and movement sucks in BF2 on the 360.

everyone should at least try and get this experience once … playing 1st person shooters on consoles sucks, it sucks so much that there are no words that could describe it.

FPS is better on a pc for most of playing, but playing on a console is not that bad for me. Some people play the shooters on consoles just fine. I have tried the BF2 demo and it went just fine for me, with the exception of it not being ET:QW demo or game. If people are a pc purest fine, buy the pc version, but don’t leave the console lovers out in the cold. :wink:

(P4nth3r) #26

I’m missing an option in that vote. cause both games don’t excite me at all =/
Maybe but RTCW2 with it or an option NONE!!!

Greetz Panther

(fattakin) #27

Party Pooper aka way too grumpy

(Pytox) #28

We’re also forgetting UT 2007 :wink:

(P4nth3r) #29

^^ monday morning, you figure the rest =P
Btw I like WWII games, (like rtcw, w:et & bf1942)
ET:QW & BF2 are a disgrace =/

Greetz Way2Evil aka Panther (grumphy ^^ ) :nag:

(ParanoiD) #30

No we are not, we are neither waiting for BF2142 tho. We are waiting for ET:QW.

At least me and the SD :tapir:

(Pytox) #31

No we are not, we are neither waiting for BF2142 tho. We are waiting for ET:QW.

At least me and the SD :tapir:[/quote]
I’m waiting for ET:QW too but UT is also in the same theme as QW/BF will be :stuck_out_tongue:

(kamikazee) #32

No, it’s not.
UT is a futuristic frag-them-at-freaking-speeds-shooter (probably even in another timezone) whilst ET:QW is a semi-futuristic get-along-with-yir-objectives-shooter.
And that new BF game is probably another drive-around-and-park-yir-ass-at-a-flag-shooter.

(nate_6009) #33

I agree with kamikazee. UT is a twitch shooter. Battlefield and ET:QW are objective-based shooters without hyper fast movement. Also the later two have more team based points then UT has.

(Crylar) #34

Never did understand people playing the BF games, probably never will.

(Joe999) #35

i wouldn’t say that bf is objective-based, neither would i put bf into the same category as qw :wink:

stupid flag capturing is not a real objective, neither has it something to do with quality gameplay.

(ParanoiD) #36

Introducing a new award at SD forums: The Jahahaa Award!

This deserves a Jahahaa award :slight_smile: congratz :stuck_out_tongue:

(kamikazee) #37

Jahahaa!

Is there an official award event planned? :stuck_out_tongue: