Acquiring trinkets through accumulation of play time is (imo) a bad idea

(Jostabeere) #21

I believe 60 isn’t much for people who really want them.

(SereneFlight) #22

Yup. Screw the family and shit even if it’s Christmas!

(TheAcidpiss) #23

how many people do you know, that are willing to spend that much time in the Christmas holidays to get it?

I personally know zero

EDIT: When and if I finally see someone with a snowman trinket in the future, my only thought will be ‘you had nothing else to do during the Christmas holidays you poor thing?’

(Runeforce) #24

how many people do you know, that are willing to spend that much time in the Christmas holidays to get it?

I personally know zero

[/quote]

How many people do you know that don’t have anybody to celebrate christmas with?
Personally I know a couple!

(Jostabeere) #25

how many people do you know, that are willing to spend that much time in the Christmas holidays to get it?

I personally know zero

[/quote]

Multiple ones. I am one of them. Also you seem to care a lot for someone who doesn’t care at all :open_mouth:

(TheAcidpiss) #26

how many people do you know, that are willing to spend that much time in the Christmas holidays to get it?

I personally know zero

[/quote]

Multiple ones. I am one of them. Also you seem to care a lot for someone who doesn’t care at all :open_mouth: [/quote]

you need to get your points straight (its starting to annoy me) and I’m pretty chill when it comes to forums, your just a person in front of a monitor that I don’t know, and I’m just a person in front of a monitor that you don’t know, that’s it.

I said I don’t care for the trinket, look for yourself.

But I sure >>>>>CARE<<<<< about the principle of the majority of the player base not being able to achieve this reward in a reasonable time frame.

Get your shite straight before you spout it, I’m starting to understand why you have so many disagree’s in your profile.

PS, go find a stat sheet of the time most people play video games per week and tell me if 60 hours is even possible for them in two weeks.

but you don’t need too, because you already know its true.

Ill keep it light and simple and ask you a question that’s the same.

Do you think playing a video game for 60 hours in just over two weeks for a cosmetic item is reasonable for the majority of the player base?

(Izzy) #27

And all this for a thing only you can see (if you pay attention to it) and that is likely to drop 1 or 2 fps.

//Best 60 hours ever :slight_smile:

(Jostabeere) #28

You get one after 3 hrs. And you can equip only one for all loadouts at the same time. So everyone who played for 3 hours will get 100% of the content Optional trinkets are skins.

(Drac0rion) #29

[quote=“Jostabeere;125725”]
You get one after 3 hrs. And you can equip only one for all loadouts at the same time. So everyone who played for 3 hours will get 100% of the content. [/quote]

Fully agree with this, but I’d like to consider myself more than just casual player in DB and I understand SD & Nexon made the trinket event to reward the players who invest more into the game during the event, but this is simply extremely badly done.

I doubt ANY of the devs themselves would put that kind of effort into something like this. If I’m wrong, please, let them finally leave a comment and prove me wrong.

(TheAcidpiss) #30

[quote=“Jostabeere;125725”][quote=“TheAcidpiss;125720”]

you need to get your points straight (its starting to annoy me) and I’m pretty chill when it comes to forums, your just a person in front of a monitor that I don’t know, and I’m just a person in front of a monitor that you don’t know, that’s it.

I said I don’t care for the trinket, look for yourself.

But I sure >>>>>CARE<<<<< about the principle of the majority of the player base not being able to achieve this reward in a reasonable time frame.

[/quote]

You get one after 3 hrs. And you can equip only one for all loadouts at the same time. So everyone who played for 3 hours will get 100% of the content Optional trinkets are skins.[/quote]

Again, off point!! :neutral:

I’m not talking about the 3 hour trinket, or the 15 hour one. Obviously because I think its reasonable.

ill take it by not answering the question that its a yes?

(Jostabeere) #31

Why are you even start talking about the aquisition of an optional item you don’t care about?
If it’s too much, people won’t do it. That simple. If it’s not, they will do it.
But you just sound like you don’t accept other opinions and you force your “it’s too much for holidays” as the only right one.
I find the 60 hrs NOT too much and reasonable, even if it’s a pretty big chunk. Why? Because it’s free and optional.

(PeneTraitor) #32

psssst, you don’t need the trinket

(TheAcidpiss) #33

[quote=“Jostabeere;125732”][quote=“TheAcidpiss;125729”]

Again, off point!! :neutral:

I’m not talking about the 3 hour trinket, or the 15 hour one. Obviously because I think its reasonable.

ill take it by not answering the question that its a yes?
[/quote]

Why are you even start talking about the aquisition of an optional item you don’t care about?
If it’s too much, people won’t do it. That simple. If it’s not, they will do it.
But you just sound like you don’t accept other opinions and you force your “it’s too much for holidays” as the only right one.
I find the 60 hrs NOT too much and reasonable, even if it’s a pretty big chunk. Why? Because it’s free and optional.
[/quote]

Again its not about the material, is the principle

most peoples ‘opinions’ in the thread are of the same mind, one even states ‘ridiculous’

thanks for answering my question, I look forward to seeing your snowman trinket!!! :slight_smile:

(Jostabeere) #34

[quote=“TheAcidpiss;125739”]I look forward to seeing your snowman trinket!!! :slight_smile:
[/quote]
“Stop liking what I don’t like!!! You’re wrong, I’m right!!!”
I will get the snowman. Don’t worry worry about me.

(FireWorks) #35

The talent of twisting words and ignoring any possibly reasonable argument…

What I find interesting is that theres only Jostabeere with his strong opinion in this thread. But at least he answers every post with some evasive post.

My question however, why would you do an event that is impossible to do for the vast majority of players? Regardless if you can do it or not, does that make sense to you?

Also, noone answered me about the autoclicker topic. Dont you see afk people trying to get the trinket as an annoyment? I do and judging from the kickvotes, afk people are not popular on most servers either.
We know that the reports about it dont get treated as cheating and we know that the clickers work against the autokick you posted about so smart in your first answer, @Jostabeere.

So, why would someone forcefully give an incentive to such behaviour?

(Jostabeere) #36

[quote=“FireWorks;125751”]The talent of twisting words and ignoring any possibly reasonable argument…

What I find interesting is that theres only Jostabeere with his strong opinion in this thread. But at least he answers every post with some evasive post.

My question however, why would you do an event that is impossible to do for the vast majority of players? Regardless if you can do it or not, does that make sense to you?

Also, noone answered me about the autoclicker topic. Dont you see afk people trying to get the trinket as an annoyment? I do and judging from the kickvotes, afk people are not popular on most servers either.
We know that the reports about it dont get treated as cheating and we know that the clickers work against the autokick you posted about so smart in your first answer, @Jostabeere.

So, why would someone forcefully give an incentive to such behaviour?

[/quote]

The whole autoclicker thing is an assumption. Until the event starts we can’t know if people will use such. And I believe NGS will deal with bots quite well.

Also, I find the term “Impossible” heavily exaggregated.

P.S. You mean ignoring the only argument: “It’s too much, I know for sure the majority won’t get the snowman. That’s why it’s all bad!”? That’s an opinion, my friend.

(Mc1412013) #37

I’m surprised @RazielWarmonic or any of the other nxa/SD people are comenting on this. we all mostly agree the play time requirement is too long

(RazielWarmonic) #38

I’m lurking, taking notes.
:#

(wiski) #39

No, 3 hours for one trinket, 15 hours for two trinkets, 60 hours for 3 trinkets.

So really, it’s 60 hours if you care to get the 3rd trinket, but for most people it will be 15 hours over 16 days for 2 trinkets.

(Jostabeere) #40

I’m lurking, taking notes.
:# [/quote]
@RazielWarmonic
Can I have your honest opinion? What do you think about people complaining again about stuff they wanted in the last event? After CW people said: “We want stuff you need to play a longer time, but you get them for sure” And now after you’ve implemented this exact thing, It’s bad again.