Would you like the Dome in Dome to be bigger/obvious?
I’m pretty sure said dome is the thing the mercs are fighting over, so it makes sense to make it bigger.
really wish there was a moment where the attackers reach the very front of the dome.
It’s obvious that the attackers are attacking the defenses that are stopping their bombers from reaching the dome, why not reach it on foot and blow it up, I mean, we’ve blown up some pump controls and drowned and put bombs in a building only for it to blow up in our faces, why not do a suicide mission to blow up the Millennium Dome, all we need is to actually blow up the London Eye in Terminal and it’ll all be awesome.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.
Yes and no. I do want to it to be bigger/more obvious, but I do not want that to change the current map.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.[/quote]
I totally agree to this. If you call a map “Dome” the Dome itself should be at least a part of the map or the missions should take place inside it. Aside from that I really like the map Dome and if they were going to add the Dome somewhere to the missions it would change the map completely. That would be kind of a waste to such a fine map imo.
They should have given this map another name and/or make a map that matches the given name.
[quote=“deliciousJoke;81873”]Yes and no. I do want to it to be bigger/more obvious, but I do not want that to change the current map.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.[/quote]
I totally agree to this. If you call a map “Dome” the Dome itself should be at least a part of the map or the missions should take place inside it. Aside from that I really like the map Dome and if they were going to add the Dome somewhere to the missions it would change the map completely. That would be kind of a waste to such a fine map imo.
They should have given this map another name and/or make a map that matches the given name.[/quote]
@deliciousJoke
The thing is, it’s too late for that amount of change.
[quote=“Ye_Olde_Buttcheeks;81891”][quote=“deliciousJoke;81873”]Yes and no. I do want to it to be bigger/more obvious, but I do not want that to change the current map.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.[/quote]
I totally agree to this. If you call a map “Dome” the Dome itself should be at least a part of the map or the missions should take place inside it. Aside from that I really like the map Dome and if they were going to add the Dome somewhere to the missions it would change the map completely. That would be kind of a waste to such a fine map imo.
They should have given this map another name and/or make a map that matches the given name.[/quote]
@deliciousJoke
The thing is, it’s too late for that amount of change. [/quote]
How hard could a name change be?
Checking the Google Maps data for the Millennium Dome against Dome screenshots, it turns out the fighting area is just across the Thames. We’d have to relocate it to right beside the Dome and have Attackers fighting their way to the entrance, which might or might not require changing existing map architecture in any way.
[quote=“Samniss_Arandeen;82077”][quote=“Ye_Olde_Buttcheeks;81891”][quote=“deliciousJoke;81873”]Yes and no. I do want to it to be bigger/more obvious, but I do not want that to change the current map.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.[/quote]
I totally agree to this. If you call a map “Dome” the Dome itself should be at least a part of the map or the missions should take place inside it. Aside from that I really like the map Dome and if they were going to add the Dome somewhere to the missions it would change the map completely. That would be kind of a waste to such a fine map imo.
They should have given this map another name and/or make a map that matches the given name.[/quote]
@deliciousJoke
The thing is, it’s too late for that amount of change. [/quote]
How hard could a name change be?
Checking the Google Maps data for the Millennium Dome against Dome screenshots, it turns out the fighting area is just across the Thames. We’d have to relocate it to right beside the Dome and have Attackers fighting their way to the entrance, which might or might not require changing existing map architecture in any way. [/quote]
@Samniss_Arandeen
Considering the Inside of the Millennium Dome is generally a flat bottom, if the Devs just moved the map inside it wouldn’t make any graphical sense to the real Millennium Dome, destroying the games fantastic recreations of real-world locations into the game. Thus why that amount of change wouldn’t happen unless they just scrapped current Dome.
[quote=“Ye_Olde_Buttcheeks;82521”][quote=“Samniss_Arandeen;82077”][quote=“Ye_Olde_Buttcheeks;81891”][quote=“deliciousJoke;81873”]Yes and no. I do want to it to be bigger/more obvious, but I do not want that to change the current map.
Don’t we all.[/quote]
Of course. When the map is called “Dome”, maybe the eponymous dome should be more than just a background feature on an otherwise run-of-the-mill map.[/quote]
I totally agree to this. If you call a map “Dome” the Dome itself should be at least a part of the map or the missions should take place inside it. Aside from that I really like the map Dome and if they were going to add the Dome somewhere to the missions it would change the map completely. That would be kind of a waste to such a fine map imo.
They should have given this map another name and/or make a map that matches the given name.[/quote]
@deliciousJoke
The thing is, it’s too late for that amount of change. [/quote]
How hard could a name change be?
Checking the Google Maps data for the Millennium Dome against Dome screenshots, it turns out the fighting area is just across the Thames. We’d have to relocate it to right beside the Dome and have Attackers fighting their way to the entrance, which might or might not require changing existing map architecture in any way. [/quote]
@Samniss_Arandeen
Considering the Inside of the Millennium Dome is generally a flat bottom, if the Devs just moved the map inside it wouldn’t make any graphical sense to the real Millennium Dome, destroying the games fantastic recreations of real-world locations into the game. Thus why that amount of change wouldn’t happen unless they just scrapped current Dome. [/quote]
That’s how the dome is in our world, yes. What’s there to say that they didn’t use the Dome during the Dirty Bomb Incidents as a massive refuge shelter or auxillary command station?
Otherwise I’m with the rest; If it’s called Dome, the Dome must be more visible.
I can settle with a namechange too, but then I want a map that has a bit of the Dome itself to be called Dome.
@Jaeger They shouldn’t have named this map “Dome” in the first place. Imo best thing they could do now is rename it like you said and make a map with the Dome itself in it. Although they shouldn’t name it “Dome” too, that might get confusing. Instead the name should refer to the current use of the building, like that refuge shelter.
EXE_GimmeShelter[/quote]
Imagine it as a arena.
TDM_Millennium
EXE_GimmeShelter[/quote]
Imagine it as a arena.
TDM_Millennium[/quote]
Part of me wants to say no to TDM, part of me wants to say yes to it.
Either way, I like the Rolling Stones reference in mine better.
EXE_GimmeShelter[/quote]
Imagine it as a arena.
TDM_Millennium[/quote]
Part of me wants to say no to TDM, part of me wants to say yes to it.
Either way, I like the Rolling Stones reference in mine better.[/quote]
I’m pretty we just want something new/more content.