All the good from W:ET and ET:QW
SMART system
and what he says:
[QUOTE=Ruben0s;411497]Ingame stats:
K/D ratio
Headshots
Headshot ratio
Accuracy
Damage given / damage received
Dedicated servers
VOIP, but it should be off by default.
Large maps (30+ players)
1 person spectator mode
Good working anti-cheat
Demo recording
Streaming support (to websites like twitch or own3d)
I would love to see a SDK, but if that’s not possible map editor tools.
Easter eggs
Dirty Bombs[/QUOTE]
Custom map integration +++ easy to get on a server, maybe a vote system to avoid the bazzilion crap map
Custom Soundmode possible for some extent (footsteps and battlesense sounds in general should stay pure, weapon sound on the other hands +++) and clientside only, this way no one has to ear that i,ve put the q3 shotgun sound for my ears pleasure instead of the game original shotgun sound
Fast paced
Vehicles with balance depending on the number of players on the map
Dont break what is already working : general pace, weapon bank, sprint, low spread, high recoil for the powerfull weapons, cookable nade, and so on (exhaustive list later)
The more important, focus on the core game and build the incentive and perks around it, if the game is relatively fast paced, high learnin curve, the hitboxes are right and it’s bugs free, people will love it and play it, if the perks around it are not balance killer and do not interfere too much with the core game but bring something more, people will adore it and the game will be in all mouthes and in all home 
Peace
With good accuracy(ET-like spraying) and lack of iron-sights needed to get it, we won;'t need mods, just maps. That can possibly make things easier to provide. The only things I would miss would be chicken-grenades and flower-mines…
I don’t like iron-sights either and much prefer accurate hip-fire weapons for fast gameplay but what about ironsights for mid/long range which only offer semi-auto or burst depending on the weapon when iron-sighting?
Beats using hacky-not-so-great fov script/binds (if they will even be possible in the game).
1/ loads of maps
2/ evil and righteous teams
3/ open areas, large maps
4/ motion detectors
5/ double jumps
6/ dynamic objects
7/ non restrictive use of items, ie i can put that any where i want.
[QUOTE=Apples;411654]- Custom map integration +++ easy to get on a server, maybe a vote system to avoid the bazzilion crap map
Custom Soundmode possible for some extent (footsteps and battlesense sounds in general should stay pure, weapon sound on the other hands +++) and clientside only, this way no one has to ear that i,ve put the q3 shotgun sound for my ears pleasure instead of the game original shotgun sound
Fast paced
Vehicles with balance depending on the number of players on the map
Dont break what is already working : general pace, weapon bank, sprint, low spread, high recoil for the powerfull weapons, cookable nade, and so on (exhaustive list later)
The more important, focus on the core game and build the incentive and perks around it, if the game is relatively fast paced, high learnin curve, the hitboxes are right and it’s bugs free, people will love it and play it, if the perks around it are not balance killer and do not interfere too much with the core game but bring something more, people will adore it and the game will be in all mouthes and in all home
Peace[/QUOTE]
This man speaks much sense.
Hi guys, i was a huge Wolf ET fan, i played that game for years, its a shame no one does anymore…
brink was a huge downer for me, didn’t like it that much, sorry…
My favorite stuff from ET was the fast pace gameplay (the ironsights were a big factor here), the classes… The medics were a bit OP i think though, the server system, and the map system, players making maps is allways a good thing… maybe use a “karma” system like trackmania…
I have my fingers crossed on this one… best of luck developing this 
Oh, and the disguise thing was cool too
[QUOTE=WrongMan;411758]Hi guys, i was a huge Wolf ET fan, i played that game for years, its a shame no one does anymore…
brink was a huge downer for me, didn’t like it that much, sorry…
My favorite stuff from ET was the fast pace gameplay (the ironsights were a big factor here), the classes… The medics were a bit OP i think though, the server system, and the map system, players making maps is allways a good thing… maybe use a “karma” system like trackmania…
I have my fingers crossed on this one… best of luck developing this
Oh, and the disguise thing was cool too[/QUOTE]
Agree, medic should be a little bit less offensive class, and more like a… medic. Disguise system was best made in ET. ETQW changed it unnecessarily… Iron-sights in theory adds something to the depth of tactical shooter, although I don’t feel its what we need there. ET was cool without it, QW was a bit less cool with.
crouch = iron sight in RTCW and W:ET, so not a biggy to have a spread modifier, just make sure the short to medium gunplay is left intact (as per RtCW).
On my list;
As others have said, really dont deviate from the core ideas in RtCW - by all means add better out of game elements (matchmaking, findafriend etc etc) as long as it doesnt detract from the core gameplay.
And best of luck!
Hello, I’m from our beloved Wolfenstein: Enemy Territory (playing it since 2006) and since it’s kinda dead now, that would be awesome to see Dirty Bomb going for the same gamestyle so here are some points to add to the game in my opinion :
I’ll think about it and put more points in few days 
Breathe = some landscapes , vehicules, objectives,team play & some innovation; … new ideas ! please.
-fast movement
-strafe jumping
-weaponbank grenades!!!
-server browser like ETQW
-fast movement
-accurate weapons
-high skill ceiling, high learning curve.
Disagree here. The feeling of a game like ET or QW is strongly influenced by how it is graphically designed too. Both ET and ETQW has this something. It’s not about how fancy effects you use, its about how you do that. And it is worth time. Compare how you feel after 2 hours with CS:S against the CS:GO aftermatch - graphics can be irritating, can fit the game building it’s reception along with other types of incentives, or means of “marketing”. Even harder to make it remain after configuration, this something :). ET and QW were well done in that dimension. We would have to waste much time on trying to prove it’s not significant, while apologists have quite easy thing to do, as there is plenty of theory around(psychology of marketing). Finally having separate “mechanisms” in brain responsible for getting pleasure from a game, and for trying to figure out what brings us the pleasure - we shall not easily erase what was good in the ET and QW. Simply saying - let’s not brink it.
Although I completely agree that we don’t need overrated cheap effects, that we will turn off anyway. Just need to say - we really appreciate your work designers! And as I don’t really see how artists could be easily transferred to code-writing, I have nothing against them spending whole their working time solely on the design. That was casuistic, I know… But it sounds convincing! 
Anyway - either great netcode would fail without good style of visuals, and awesome graphical design wouldn’t gave a game success without some great code. We need all the components on their places.
What I want the upcoming game to be most, is coming back to the ET based on deep understanding of how severely Brink was a mistake.
About vehicles - I agree that there should be much of game-time without them, but I’d like to also have some campaigns with the vehicles. What seems to me as good solution is remaking the ET core-maps, and QW maps - why shall the work on them be wasted? Take a look on the Counter Strikes! What Valve does? Carefully walking up to a millimeter from their successful base idea, they are not brinking around! They are taking both maps and mechanics from the previous titles, why SD shouldn’t follow that path? It actually came to it declaratively - there is no “Brink” in “authors” part of the teaser :).
Hope dies last! Hope that DB will be ET and ETQW best. - just as Splash Damage ppl stated in the teaser.
HELL NO. Imo everyone should play with the same settings, except for mousesensivity and FOV. With configs you can create an advantage. And this is unfair for people who are new to the game / not willing to invest time in optimizing their config.
RTCW/W:ET/QUAKE are the perfect examples why configs should be forbidden. I spend years in optimizing my configs, and with those configs I could see/hear/know way more things than the casual gamer. Resulting in complains (and tons of bans from unknowing admins), because I could see through smoke grenades, hear the enemy from miles away, became unhitable, remove almost all the recoil from guns. And there are way more things that gave me an advantage. This shouldn’t be possible and shows that the game is faulty, because everyone should have equal chances.
[QUOTE=knippon;411818]-fast movement
-strafe jumping
-weaponbank grenades!!!
-server browser like ETQW
-fast movement
-accurate weapons
-high skill ceiling, high learning curve.[/QUOTE]
What he said…
PLUS
+Balanced maps with good choke points but open enough to make it interesting
+Comp ready with Stopwatch
+Spec Mode
I would love to see support for the competitive community as well as open avenues of discussion with people controlling the game so we can provide suggestions and the like for their competitive formats.
I would also love to see a BombTV or something like that so that people can easily watch the games with a spectator hud that gives them all the necessary information.