Welp at least we tried!

(Breezer) #1

http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
yup. Don’t you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?

(DB Genome editor) #2

Seems fair to me to call it a draw, it’s not like it will happen very often.

(Szakalot) #3

[quote=“dignifiedIdeal;2115”]http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
yup. Don’t you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?[/quote]

Why? is the first objective somehow more relevant? As far as the game-logic is concerned its about the end goal: whether the final objective was completed. And if nobody managed that, then how fast the pre-final was completed.

Perfect draw scenario.

(Breezer) #4

[quote=“Szakalot;13000”][quote=“dignifiedIdeal;2115”]http://i.imgur.com/UAf0daH.jpg
yup. Don’t you guys think that at this point the team that as complet the First objective first should be winning ?[/quote]

Why? is the first objective somehow more relevant? As far as the game-logic is concerned its about the end goal: whether the final objective was completed. And if nobody managed that, then how fast the pre-final was completed.

Perfect draw scenario.[/quote]

Both team manage to blow up the last objective wich mean both team achive their goal !

I feel like if both team manage to do the 1st objective at the same time and dont complete the end goal the teams should get a DRAW.

But when both teams win the end goal there should be something coming out from other objective. It add a little spice !

(NuclearSharkhead) #5

This scenario seems OK to me. No need for a tie-breaker. One team is allowed to facepalm while the other goes “YES WE DENIED THEM THE WIN!!!”