Well SD & DB, you finally got me


(pEaRson) #1

All the RNG in this game is very absurd. Doesnt feel rewarding at all and just smacks me in the face and says “YO, lots of time and effort I see, well %^$# that and start all over.” Thanks but no thanks. The time spent in this game gets sick and tiring. Got to also hate the loadout system and the devs thought on that. LOL. Devs, you guys think its all good and want to avoid conflict. The fact that loadouts arent changing because some players have used money in this game sounds like an excuse to avoid conflict and move the game in a easier way. Isnt it better to change the game now when its still on Beta rather than changing it after official release? Pretty obvious but… RNG, loadout system, credits, tutorial,… all of em are still pretty bad. Ignore new mercs and maps, improve in what you guys already got.

Well, all the time spent in this game is pretty sick and draining. Moving on. When OW coming out? Any new games for 2016?


(brennanfreak) #2

Won’t be missin ya.


(Jostabeere) #3

http://text.glitter-graphics.net/psy/b.gifhttp://text.glitter-graphics.net/psy/y.gifhttp://text.glitter-graphics.net/psy/e.gifhttp://dl3.glitter-graphics.net/empty.gif


(Backuplight) #4

If you weren’t so salty people might actually agree with the sentiment behind your post, or at least parts of it. I hate the level RNG is taken to, but it doesn’t stop me enjoying the game.


(zealousHumdinger) #5

I will just leave this here for some warmth and comfort.


(YeOldeButtcheek) #6

You’ll most likely be back


(blufflord) #7

whats wrong with the loadout system o.0
Other than some older mercs having only some good loadouts, im perfectly fine with the systems. Also fine with how the credits work, and I’m sure the tutorial is being worked on. I don’t really see the problem u have, except rng, but everyone else seems to deal with it, no?


(SnakekillerX) #8

Personally while RNG can be a bit of a pain in the butt… I’d almost welcome a full RNG possibility on a card.

You’d take all possible weapons and augments that you’d normally be able to get with X merc and fully randomize a card (no longer stuck in the 16 presets).

To avoid breaking current load outs they could even make a new case type that will generate a card for you with random properties, purchasable with credits or cash.

You’d never be able to get say a proxy with an M4, but it might be possible one day for you to roll a copy of your favorite load out card but with with a different melee weapon which might make you favor the new card over the old.


(Amerika) #9

Mercs are not RNG, cards are not RNG and credits are not RNG. Cosmetics are. I personally hate the RNG/gambling mechanics built into the game for cosmetics but I don’t play the game for cosmetics. I play because I enjoy it.

Hopefully you remember that you play games to have fun and not because your gun/character is gold/red/blue/ugly christmas sweater and come back.


(LifeupOmega) #10

Pretty much. The loadout system is abysmal and holds back potential of what mercs could be, but Splash seem set in their ways of keeping a terrible system and on top of that refuse to change vastly inferior loadouts. Maybe one day they’ll realise that no, you can’t buff some augments to make all loadouts worth using, because some augments will always and forever be garbage.


(N8o) #11

I never understood why people feel the need to come to the forums to post that they are leaving.
It happens in like a ton of games, especially WoW.
Goodbye.


(MarsRover) #12

Pretty much. The loadout system is abysmal and holds back potential of what mercs could be, but Splash seem set in their ways of keeping a terrible system and on top of that refuse to change vastly inferior loadouts. Maybe one day they’ll realise that no, you can’t buff some augments to make all loadouts worth using, because some augments will always and forever be garbage.[/quote]

Oh don’t be such a pessimist! I’m sure they know exactly how to balance Sparks loadouts to match the 383. Somehow… Umm, yeah… :confounded:


(SereneFlight) #13

“on or before 21/6/2016”


(Amerika) #14

Not much left to say about this topic so closing.