We need a Ranked Execution Mode:


(Sorotia) #21

@CyberRecon

I’m sorry you clearly are hitting the disagree button with anyone that doesn’t agree with your point, but they speak the truth.

A lot of people avoid execution…and a lot of people don’t do ranked…so it’s pretty clear it would be a waste of resources that would be better spent elsewhere right now.


(frostyvampire) #22

If you want competitive Execution, go play csgo.
I honestly think this gamemode shouldn’t have even made it’s way to Dirty Bomb. We have the amazing Stopwatch which makes this game unique, just like the bombsite missions is a gamemode that makes csgo unique


(CyberRecon) #23

[quote=“Sorotia;183255”]@CyberRecon

I’m sorry you clearly are hitting the disagree button with anyone that doesn’t agree with your point, but they speak the truth.

A lot of people avoid execution…and a lot of people don’t do ranked…so it’s pretty clear it would be a waste of resources that would be better spent elsewhere right now. [/quote]

“but they speak the truth.” Do you have any real evidence to support that statement? Or is it just another biased statement to support your claim? You see, truth can be subjective. Never once did I say my concepts were “True” nor did I say I have a factually backed up statement, these are opinions sir! And as far as me hitting the disagree button, why do you care? People did so to me when they disagreed, am I not entitled to do the same? Seems like if any opposite opinion presents itself, or if someone disagrees with yours or others ideology it’s somehow bad or seems wrong to do!?

The fact that you took the time to see how many people I disagreed with is kinda sad to be honest, and again, why should you care?

On the point of your statement being a “FACT!” Do you have any statistical data to support your claim? Some could say, that the people who don’t voice their opinion on this forum would agree with my opinion as well, had they have been here… But I am not in complete opposition here either, although my dislike on this topic are numbered more, there are still some that agree. So the assumption that you have a “FACT” to disprove my opinion is not really relevant.


(CyberRecon) #24

[quote=“FrostyVampire;183260”]If you want competitive Execution, go play csgo.
I honestly think this gamemode shouldn’t have even made it’s way to Dirty Bomb. We have the amazing Stopwatch which makes this game unique, just like the bombsite missions is a gamemode that makes csgo unique[/quote]

Again, it’s like people don’t read my full posts. -_- Let me quote what I said in an earlier post:

Now that’s been said, I pose a question:

Question; Will it affect a non-respawn player to have this mode included? Keep in mind that extra development is “NOT” necessary for implementation. All that needs to be done is a simple activation in to the code which already exists. So the argument of better time spent elsewhere is ridiculous. But again, will affect respawn players? I mean, considering the people who play Execution only, are going to stick to that mode, will instead have a second option instead of just playing on an unranked server. How would this do harm to the Respawn loyal?

And to also state something;

I play this game because it has Execution! That is not to say that I never play Respawn, cause I do for practice, but removing said mode, would just steer away the player base that got it’s interest in said game due to the mode being here! If anything, you should thank the development process for adding it in here and attracting players that like round based game modes! Mainly because it has in-turn increased your population also for Respawn. People came here to play Execution, but ended up playing Respawn as well! If anything, it has increased the numbers for you!


(Sorotia) #25

Because I’ve seen people all over say how they pass on execution missions, I do it myself, I’ve never played a single execution game and I know others who haven’t. I know for a fact that ranked queues are slow.

So put two and two together…but fine…I know you’ll disagree button this one too…why even make these posts if you’re just going to completely disagree with everyone.


(CyberRecon) #26

[quote=“Sorotia;183273”]Because I’ve seen people all over say how they pass on execution missions, I do it myself, I’ve never played a single execution game and I know others who haven’t. I know for a fact that ranked queues are slow.

So put two and two together…but fine…I know you’ll disagree button this one too…why even make these posts if you’re just going to completely disagree with everyone.[/quote]

Because it’s called a disagreement for a reason LOL… If you can’t handle a virtual button that allows you to disagree then, sorry! It’s not like I am insulting you when I hit that button, it’s just stating I disagree with your opinion. God, this generation really gets frantic with little virtual nuances.

And again, just because you know people or you yourself don’t play the mode, doesn’t mean your statement encompasses the whole broad spectrum of players! That’s like me saying, “I know people who disliked the new Avengers Movie, therefor it should never be seen in theaters anywhere!” That is what we call a biased opinion claiming to be fact.

Oh, and before I forget, like if anyone cares about your virtual online likes and dislikes in your profile on a F2P game… -_- If that’s why you are upset about me disliking, then I suggest if you are sensitive to such scrutiny to stay off social media! As other are free to dislike, agree, or LOL, I will not satisfy your virtual emotional status just because you feel like you or other are being attacked because I hit a disagree. It’s not like I am attacking anyone when I hit that button, it’s just me disagreeing! If you don’t like it, TOUGH!


(Sorotia) #27

Nah…just shows how childish you are…not that they can’t see that already the way you’re going around like you’re right and everyone else is wrong.


(CyberRecon) #28

Never did I say that I was “Right!” I was stating opinions, obviously, you take it personal and then proceed to attack like if I was trying to state facts! Never once have I said in any of my post that I have “FACTS” to display, meanwhile, several response posts have claimed as such…

And as for being childish?! Why, because I have a counter argument? If I dare say, it’s childish to get pissy when someone disagrees with your statements and then go on the attack! (That is not me calling you childish, just giving an example.)

Here, lets end this. If you don’t like my purposed concepts, then fine, write about it, disagree and then leave it at that! But to arrogantly call them facts, get upset when I have a disagreement of my own, or use said buttons to show that, then that’s where I draw the line! I have no wish to cater to arrogant statements not supported by statistics, attacks, or someone who is becoming emotional over a forum post. Keep the subject on the OP and nothing more. Again, to reiterate, I don’t care if you are getting upset at me disliking post, or if my opposing statements fluster you! If you have the inclination to disagree, fine, do so and leave it at that!

Calling someone “childish” is a personal attack, and to stoop to such a level is a shame just because you are in disagreement.

Edit: Will be flaging your post as it is provocative in nature. Your response, calling someone “childish” is inappropriate and rude.


(Sorotia) #29

What counter argument? You’re basically just telling people they’re wrong with no evidence to back it up…I haven’t seen a single person really support you in this thread…

You basically told one of the best players (least I’ve played with/against) he is wrong even though I’m sure he has plenty of experience with ranked play…


(CyberRecon) #30

[quote=“Sorotia;183294”]What counter argument? You’re basically just telling people they’re wrong with no evidence to back it up…I haven’t seen a single person really support you in this thread…

You basically told one of the best players (least I’ve played with/against) he is wrong even though I’m sure he has plenty of experience with ranked play…[/quote]

Find a single post of mine where I said that someone else was “WRONG!” Never have I said that in this forum. Secondly, do you know me? How do you know that I don’t have more experience with this game, or that your statement of the “BEST” player (which by the way is subjective) how do you know that I or other aren’t better? And to that note, why does his or anyone’s skill have to do with my opinion?

These post seem to be unsupported by actual facts and in that sense you and other seem to want to point t’words opinion as a form of fact! And as you say no support on my side…? Hmmm wonder what those 5 people that agreed with me are then? Just because I have little support VS. the amount of disagreements doesn’t mean that I am alone in thinking this. Again, this is my opinion. If you don’t like that, fine!

Doesn’t stop me from having one though! As I am not trying to stop you or anyone here from doing the same.

But please, I ask this one thing. Stop bringing up examples and calling them Facts; "My friend is the greatest so he is 100% right etc…etc… It’s called an OPINION!

Again, what does being good at the game have to do with my initial statement? That’s like people who boast KDR in shooters -_- Like if that meant anything.


(CyberRecon) #31

[quote=“Sorotia;183294”]What counter argument? You’re basically just telling people they’re wrong with no evidence to back it up…[/quote] Really, I have? Please feel free to point out where I said that they were “WRONG!” In fact, all I have seen is the opposite! People telling me I am wrong, and then calling it FACT without evidence to support it! So, I think you need to reanalyze that statement.

Never once have I called my post “FACTS.” I have every time called them OPINIONS. So, again, please prove to me where I have done as such? If not, then I urge you to stop basing this on an argument that doesn’t exist. I also advise you to work on your comprehension of the subject matter that I initially wrote.


(SnakekillerX) #32

I see nothing wrong in adding content for players. I play both objective/stopwatch and execution mode and I wouldn’t mind seeing an Ranked Execution.

People’s arguments are a bit lame as well, like it taking up resources…
They have Execution mode, and they have Stopwatch Ranked mode, how hard really would it be to just copy the Ranked aspect with Execution?

Like it or not, some people do like Execution and play it, I don’t see why limiting features/content that is completely avoidable if you so choose would be so strongly hated.

Unreal Tournament for example was a game that had a ton of game modes, did that split the game’s community, or did give opportunity for people to find something they liked in the game? You can still find UT99 servers being playing on today.

The whole “go play CS argument” people are tossing out is rather dumb as well.
By that logic Dirty Bomb shouldn’t even exist.

Have other games done re-spawning first? YES
Have other games done team based game play before? YES

If you think that adding Ranked Execution would split the player base who plays Ranked, then that in itself proves that there is some demand for it, or else no one would play it.

People are so selfish these days.


(KUST__LunarTM) #33

Take a good look at all the replies that are against Ranked Execution. Almost all of them have a single Disagree. Guess who took their time to press that good 'ol Disagree button on all those posts >_>


(Sorotia) #34

[quote=“CyberRecon;183301”][quote=“Sorotia;183294”]What counter argument? You’re basically just telling people they’re wrong with no evidence to back it up…[/quote] Really, I have? Please feel free to point out where I said that they were “WRONG!” In fact, all I have seen is the opposite! People telling me I am wrong, and then calling it FACT without evidence to support it! So, I think you need to reanalyze that statement.

Never once have I called my post “FACTS.” I have every time called them OPINIONS. So, again, please prove to me where I have done as such? If not, then I urge you to stop basing this on an argument that doesn’t exist. I also advise you to work on your comprehension of the subject matter that I initially wrote.[/quote]

“This is not correct by any means. The current Ranked game que times are alot better now for respawn,”

This is not correct by any means…well gosh darnit…sounds like you’re telling someone they’re wrong…and like I said you have put forth no evidence to prove them wrong.

You have put forth no evidence at all towards your point while you’re arguing against a wall of people. Not one single person here has agreed with you at all…I d say that is a little bit of evidence right there!

The only person even coming close to you really is one who says long way down the line. I’d say the fact that no one supports you so far is a little evidence that so far this wouldn’t be well received.


(SnakekillerX) #35

Take a good look at all the replies that are against Ranked Execution. Almost all of them have a single Disagree. Guess who took their time to press that good 'ol Disagree button on all those posts >_>[/quote]

There are 13 disagrees currently against the OP in a single post, but he isn’t able to disagree with the people who replied to him?


(KUST__LunarTM) #36

I can understand someone presenting an idea that is up for discussion being agreed and disagreed upon, but when you personally go out to click Disagree on all the posts that don’t agree with you, that’s kind of dickish. It’s even worse considering there’s a little bit of a flame war going on, which involve multiple angry posts, which will get more disagrees. Those things are saved on your profile, you know? It’d look pretty bad to have a large amount of Disagrees on your profile, only to realize that they were all from the same guy Disagreeing every post you made.

The OP had good initial intentions, but this topic is very controversial and already discussed in other threads. There isn’t anything constructive going on in this thread at all. It’s mainly just people saying No and the OP arguing with all the people who bother to explain why they said no. It is true that there are some people who agree with the OP, but they aren’t being focused on.

IMO, this thread feels like it’s turning into a flame war, and I think it should be closed.


(SnakekillerX) #37

13 disagrees and 6 agrees, I’d hardly call that no one supporting and no one agreeing.
About 30% of the people who voted like the idea, I don’t see why the people who dislike it can’t just let other people have something that won’t even effect them.

Rather than pummeling this OP with nonsense, wouldn’t it just be best to leave this thread to die. We all know regardless of anything discussed here splash damage won’t be implementing anything, or deciding not to implement anything based off of this thread anyway… but please people, stop with the BS.


(CyberRecon) #38

Why does everyone care about these virtual clicks to Rep anyway? It’s not like my rep is going to impress my wife or kids or co-workers… I could honestly care less. I clicked it cause I disagreed with the posts. Not because I was wanting to be spiteful! And as for being “Dickish?” Why cause I disagreed!?

Seriously, these assumptions about my character are just laughable at best. Why do people care to speculate why I did such and such rather analyze the material that I provided for a counter argument! Not once have I seen someone dispute my ideology on the subject, but rather focus on the miniscule aspects of my “so called mind-state” that most seem so focused on.

Can anyone provide any real proof against my statements or opinions? If not then I will say again, feel free to comment, If you have a so called “fact” then back it by using statistics and not emotions.


(CyberRecon) #39

13 disagrees and 6 agrees, I’d hardly call that no one supporting and no one agreeing.
About 30% of the people who voted like the idea, I don’t see why the people who dislike it can’t just let other people have something that won’t even effect them.

Rather than pummeling this OP with nonsense, wouldn’t it just be best to leave this thread to die. We all know regardless of anything discussed here splash damage won’t be implementing anything, or deciding not to implement anything based off of this thread anyway… but please people, stop with the BS.[/quote]

Couldn’t have said it better! I know that SD will probably do nothing about it, but was opening the idea up to the community on a forum for discussion and like minded as well as opposition opinions. But it seems people became hostile for reasons that in 'my opinion" seem redundant to the subject matter. I agree, should just let this die out now. This will be my last post on the subject, as it has strayed to something other that what I intended.


(Jostabeere) #40

I miss the part where “we” seem to “need” it.