[quote=“bushyg;c-222206”]SD need to seriously consider raising ranked to level 20 to at least help combat hackers.
[/quote]I’m not so sure how that would help. Even if a player is above level 20, how do you know if someone was using Damage hacks? Silent aim? No spread? ESP? Or have you seen hacks that removes the fall off damage of weapons (Empire 9 short rapid shots and kills at FEL-IX SR distance)?
[quote=“bushyg;c-222206”]
If you come across a cheater and they’re on your team, try to do the right thing (I know that’s beyond wishful thinking) and kick them, maybe the enemy team will be nice enough to have a player sit and play 4v4.
In the end, you’re going to vs cheaters no matter what happens. Report them, vote to surrender and maybe wait a few minutes before re-queuing.[/quote]
Well, that’s a bit extreme… It’s like surrendering to the fact that EAC is just as ineffective as NGS. And given the anomalies happening in-game right now (micro-freezes, lag spikes, out-of-bounds-error, etc), I think it’s worse.
Given the idea to roll with the influx of cheats, does that mean that Ranked Season II now is compromised even before it gets launched? And so I guess that getting ranked doesn’t hold it’s value then. I don’t think makers of EAC will be so easily give in to this premise; after all, if they can’t get this simple event sorted out, what good is high publicity event?
So, I got news that it’s on and as D9D suspected, RSII is rolling out first before EAC gets a grip on the bad players. I can very well see how this will go now. What I’m curious to find out is what is SD’s plan B strategy for player backlash. It’s seems like they’re taking a re-active stance rather than a pro-active approach to situation.