Trade-in for Containment War cards?


(Nimron) #41

[quote=“ThaiSan;105775”][quote=“Nimron;105765”]I did not get a card so far and the p2win group talks about a trade in function,
kinda dissapointing.[/quote]

Really? That sh*t again? How exactly are people with a yellow/white camo better in the game then people with a green camo?[/quote]

Because u dont agree with my opinion, u spam dislike? classic
i want 2 be a special snowflake too, thats all :’(

sometimes, the truth can hurt i know.


(Jostabeere) #42

Well, so much for CW-event. I’m going to kill myself now:
http://puu.sh/laAat/72bf0542ff.jpg
Took me nearly 3 hours or more to open ~470 cases.


(Faraleth) #43

[quote=“laudatoryLunch;105790”]Well, so much for CW-event. I’m going to kill myself now:
http://puu.sh/laAat/72bf0542ff.jpg
Took me nearly 3 hours or more to open ~470 cases.[/quote]

@laudatoryLunch 470+ cases, and you didn’t get any cobalts or CW? D: Are you for real?.. :frowning: Aww dude, so much sympathy coming your way from me right now. You deserve at least something! Curse that RNG x-x


(Mister__Wiggles) #44

@Nimron
As soon as you said ‘pay to win’ you lost all credibility and the argument along with it.


(Nimron) #45

[quote=“Mister__Wiggles;105808”]@Nimron
As soon as you said ‘pay to win’ you lost all credibility and the argument along with it.[/quote]

how would you suscribe it then? 0,3% chance vs 10%? but i get the point, it went offtopic. Nxt time prbly they should add a vote possibiliy for the “normal” players. lemme spell p2win into “wealthy” fits better for u prbly. :smiley:


(Jostabeere) #46

[quote=“Faraleth;105805”][quote=“laudatoryLunch;105790”]Well, so much for CW-event. I’m going to kill myself now:
http://puu.sh/laAat/72bf0542ff.jpg
Took me nearly 3 hours or more to open ~470 cases.[/quote]

@laudatoryLunch 470+ cases, and you didn’t get any cobalts or CW? D: Are you for real?.. :frowning: Aww dude, so much sympathy coming your way from me right now. You deserve at least something! Curse that RNG x-x[/quote]

I mean, no Cobalts is fine. I dislike both skins anyway. But I’ve expected atleast one CW card.
Too bad paying 34.99€ for a safe one and 10% chances in 10 Elite cases won’t happen for me.
35€ for like 10 CW cards I could choose from would be fine, but RNG packed with more RNG, soory SD, nope.


(Faraleth) #47

[quote=“Nimron;105812”]
how would you suscribe it then? 0,3% chance vs 10%? but i get the point, it went offtopic. Nxt time prbly they should add a vote possibiliy for the “normal” players. lemme spell p2win into “wealthy” fits better for u prbly. :smiley: [/quote]

@Nimron It’s for skins - you aren’t buying power in any way. Real money = higher chance to look shiny? That’s not pay-to-win at all. Misuse of terms like that can really rile people up, because it’s simply incorrect. :confused:


(Mister__Wiggles) #48

@Nimron
Why are you so salty about people spending real money? It buy them a skin and not a win, the percentage for normal cases is low and I was one of the first to bring up that point but going as far as being a dick to anybody that spends money is incredibly childish. ‘so not fair, people have jobs that pay for things they want, not fair p2w’. You in a nut shell my friend.


(Mister__Wiggles) #49

@laudatoryLunch
When trading comes in I’ll give you the Fletcher I got, sell it or trade it for another card of your choice. Won’t charge you a dime because you’re not throwing your toys out of the pram about it.


(Drcipres) #50

If it is 2:1 if you arent lucky, you will end up with the card for the merc you like, but with high chances of getting a shitty one, so i re roll option 1:1 and X ammount of credits will be better


(Nimron) #51

[quote=“Mister__Wiggles;105829”]@Nimron
Why are you so salty about people spending real money? It buy them a skin and not a win, the percentage for normal cases is low and I was one of the first to bring up that point but going as far as being a dick to anybody that spends money is incredibly childish. ‘so not fair, people have jobs that pay for things they want, not fair p2w’. You in a nut shell my friend. [/quote]

guess what, i spent realcash too in this game because i love it & want 2 keep it alive.

again, if some1points anything out with a bit “sarcastic” note, doesnt mean hes a d1ck so no need to insult me. Think this way, if you re angry about my spelling in this case, prbly i hit a nerv.

Anyhow, after few posts i got it, if u aint got a funky pic or 1xxxxx posts your post havent the same value as some1 like you. Kinda bad scheme of raising your playersbase


(Jostabeere) #52

[quote=“Nimron;105858”][quote=“Mister__Wiggles;105829”]@Nimron
Why are you so salty about people spending real money? It buy them a skin and not a win, the percentage for normal cases is low and I was one of the first to bring up that point but going as far as being a dick to anybody that spends money is incredibly childish. ‘so not fair, people have jobs that pay for things they want, not fair p2w’. You in a nut shell my friend. [/quote]

guess what, i spent realcash too in this game because i love it & want 2 keep it alive.

again, if some1points anything out with a bit “sarcastic” note, doesnt mean hes a d1ck so no need to insult me. Think this way, if you re angry about my spelling in this case, prbly i hit a nerv.

Anyhow, after few posts i got it, if u aint got a funky pic or 1xxxxx posts your post havent the same value as some1 like you. Kinda bad scheme of raising your playersbase[/quote]

  1. Google the term P2W. Thanks
  2. Google the term sarcasm.

(Thai-San) #53

The problem is that Dirty Bomb fans hate the term “pay to win” because SD tried their best so that everyone can enjoy the game equally and still have ways to earn some money.
I think I don’t have to explain why Dirty Bomb isn’t p2w so just try not to use that term here in the forums. You will just get hate, even if you didn’t mean it seriously.

We are still a young community and we all hope that Dirty Bomb will become big and healthy so we are kinda defensive. P2w is a harsh word these days and false statements and bad/wrong reviews (I’m talking to you Angry Joe) can ruin the future of a f2p game.


(XavienX) #54

I didn’t vote cause here’s my current collection of CW cards:


(TheAcidpiss) #55

[quote=“Xavien;106548”]I didn’t vote cause here’s my current collection of CW cards:

[/quote]

WOW you got the same ones as me!!


(Monty) #56

What I would prefer:

a) A gold cost to re-roll one CW loadout card for another completely random CW loadout card. (Higher Credit Cost)

And:

b) Trade two CW loadout cards for one mercenary specific CW loadout. (Lower Credit Cost)

The benefit is, if you got a ton of cards, you can try your luck on getting something specific and get rid of cards you do not use. But ultimately that means that you will end up with just one CW card, and if that is not what you wanted, player disgruntlement is likely. Thus, if you can also re-roll one CW card for any CW card, you introduce a credit sink, and ultimately everyone will have that one CW card they always wanted.

(Well, at least those who managed to get one… and I am just innocently pointing towards that 10+1 for €35 or what not.)