[QUOTE=Cankor;264906]The devs said something was some way. A couple of e-zines later said something different, which you took as having more weight than the dev’s previous comment because the e-zine articles were more recent.
Is that a fair summation? I’m really not sure because I didn’t follow the whole argument (not really fair to call it a debate).
Assuming all that is correct (and this point holds even if I have it wrong, although possibly it’s not relevant to the argument):
The point is that a dev’s comment is going to hold more weight than something from an e-zine, regardless of the timing. From what I’ve seen reading many of these articles many of them exhibit fact checking skills second only to their editing skills in terms of pure sloppiness.[/QUOTE]
No, it was never a matter of doubting the Dev’s credibility over an e-zine’s. It was about seeing the articles’ statements first, and not seeing a contrary statement from the Dev’s at all. That isn’t to say that there wasn’t one available, just that someone may not have seen it.