[quote=“triteTongs;31458”]Here are my reasons I click NO:
- There is 30 seconds left in the game
- I have a “win” mission to do.
This holds true with the last game I just played… I just lost 5 games in a row and I finally get a winning team to my mission done. Why would I ever vote yes in that situation?
[/quote]
I totally get your point of view, which is why to me “win” based missions are a horrible idea, as they almost never depend on you alone. When I play by myself it just comes down to luck if I do the mission or not, but if I have my teammate online then it gets much easier to achieve it. In the event of a player inbalance, giving a switching player an automatic win as a compensation, then there would be no more shuffle refusal and unbalance. The current system just forces players to take every measure to get an easy win. And that’s not right. I miss the pre mission times when everyone just wanted a game that was as balanced as possible to just have a fun competitive game. Now, it’s all about the win, to get that much desired credit.