6 months from now, Brink will probably be only $39.99. Hell, it’s already being sold at that price in some retailers. So you’re trying to tell us that spending an extra 9 bucks for DLC on for a game that only costs 40 is going to be a problem? Hell, those of us who paid full price for it should be the ones pissed. But we’re not…because we have a 2 week window to get the new content for free. And of course any future content after this DLC will obviously be “pay for” as well. But the fact remains that even with the DLC being pay for after two weeks for people who don’t pick it up, it’s still not costing much. If you seriously can’t afford 10 bucks for DLC, you may as well stop playing video games altogether.
I completely understand your stance on it having the potential of dividing the community. But if someone buys the game 2 months from now knowing full well that a majority of the player base has the new content, and they’re not going to get the full experience without it, but he/she choses not to, who’s fault is that? Splash Damage’s? Bethesda’s? No. It’s the fault of the consumer and ONLY the consumer. And let’s be honest here, 6 months from now when MW3 and BF3 are both on the market, what difference will it make if new Brink DLC will be free or have a price tag on it? I’ll personally still be playing Brink by then, but at that point…realistically all that will be left will be the DIE HARD Brink players. You’re making a stink about something that in the long run will be completely irrelevant. Like complaining about a window not being fixed…on a building that’s about to be demolished.
YOU’RE getting the DLC free. Enjoy it. If other people don’t get the new content within the two weeks, that’s their problem, not yours.

