Should have released as an arcade title

[Swimmy]

[QUOTE=SubXulu;322913]It makes me laugh the ammount of times i see you guys saying **** like A lot of people dont get it, they want mainstream crap , seriously dude stop. Brink is not complicated … its not underground , its not a revolution etc etc. I like the game but ffs stop making out you need a degree to play it, its another FPS with some objectives that need team work in order to be completed. that _ is _ it.

At the end of the day , when the **** goes down your gonna be squeezing off some rounds, throwing a syringe or repairing a turret … and may have recieved a few buffs on the way.[/QUOTE]

I know. I laugh at posters like Jess alon. Its like shut up already.

[Swimmy]

I personally think a lot of people are threatened by the possibility of Brink’s success because it would challenge their simpleton 2 bullets to kill a guy repeat strategy in gaming and instead make them actually have to have knock down drag out fights in future titles. So they find any negative aspect about Brink they can and harp on it to death.

Err no. This isn’t the days of N64 where it took a hundred bullets to kill everyone. People are looking for more realistic shooters. Not the other way around. No one feels threatened by this game. Which itself is rather pathetic that you would make such a excuse.Also, I don’t have to “find” anything negative about this game. All I have to do is take a quick look and see the mess this game is in.

Nor is this game above anyone’s head. Like you keep claiming.

[ataliba]

sure is… bad company 2 is an awesome game that was polished before it’s release and there’s still plenty of people playing

[ataliba]

Brink is good but flawed. It’s like a debut album from a very promising indie band who haven’t quite hit their stride. A lot of people will listen a few times and appreciate the effort, but won’t find anything to sustain long-term interest.

sure thing! especially when they can’t play it in multiplayer… as I’m unable to do in ps3…

[SubXulu]

I know. I laugh at posters like Jess alon. Its like shut up already.

Yes , im not sure where his school of thought comes from but hes probably the most delusional on here with regards to the games complexity and the reasons why people are complaining about it. Its seems like he thinks he ascended to some higher plain of gaming by playing Brink.

[hailey]

sure is… bad company 2 is an awesome game that was polished before it’s release and there’s still plenty of people playing

I bought BC2 because of the beta.

It wasn’t the most polished game, and it clearly wasn’t designed specifically for PC, but it was fun and it ran on my computer.

I bought Brink despite there not being a beta.

I erred greatly

[DissapointedCustomer]

Yes , im not sure where his school of thought comes from but hes probably the most delusional on here with regards to the games complexity and the reasons why people are complaining about it. Its seems like he thinks he ascended to some higher plain of gaming by playing Brink.

Don’t know about you, but I turned into a glowing ball of light and shot off into space when I finished learning to play Brink

[BRINK_disappoints]

I know. I laugh at posters like Jess alon. Its like shut up already.

HAH! Wow, I thought I was the only one who thought that way. That guy is so damn delusional. He and very few others believe that Brink is this complex beast. No… it really isn’t at all that complex. More complex than COD? Definitely. But it’s not mind-blowing. Want something complex? Be a rocket scientist. A 12-year-old kid can play this game… there is nothing “Complex” or “Deep” about it and there’s not much strategy involved. Long drawn out fights? Please… CARB can knock someone down just as fast as any gun in COD.