Yes, all those people taking literature classes look really dumb to you, don’t they?
Why in the world would you want to play with only one side? Is the game half price that way?
Who said that?
I don’t give a poop about story, gameplay comes first and that’s the only thing that will keep me playing the game.
That’s the same for us but we don’t feel the need to moon at threads that aren’t about gameplay.
Yes, I did do a search myself and came across the three of them. Those threads were simply about picking sides and that too nearly two years old.
And, the ‘security not bad as they seem’ thread had inevitably turned into a debate on real world issues for which I’m partly to blame.
What action would you recommend if someone claimed to have found the cure to cancer in his backyard and started distributing pills all around.
[QUOTE=Shadowcat;281785]
That being said, I personally support the security ideology more, they are just trying to protect the ark, and are doing what they have to. I cant support the leader’s choices, but that’s not the fault of the police.[/QUOTE]
Not doing what they have to but doing what they are told to, the same as what Gaddafi’s men are doing in Libya.
[QUOTE=tokamak;281781]These ‘lowlives’ never voted for a political climate that was able to either mitigate or adapt to climate change, and now they want a piece.
If Nader was president there probably would be at least several arks floating in the pacific and similar feats of durable development elsewhere. Everyone has an opportunity to contribute by voting.[/QUOTE]
You can’t say that they deserve their present condition because of who they voted for. People’s decisions are the product of their environment. As someone who follows American politics, I find that the Republicans belonging to the lower rung of society tend to be deluded about what really is going on and foster irrational beliefs, having grown up in such an atmosphere. Should they be denied their rights and privileges if, say, Trump becomes president and creates an Egypt like social scenario in the US?
And shouldn’t the lowlifes vote for those who they think will benefit improve their lives in the short term rather someone who advocates creating a floating city whose benefits they’d be the last to receive? Worrying about things like global warming and overpopulation is the pass-time of the well-off.


