So the graph was on “top 5 most favoured augments”.
I just don’t understand the reasoning behind it. An augment is favoured and therefore must be nerfed. So if we all used cards with “cool” then “cool” must be nerfed.
My second argument is that it is favoured for a reason, Sparks doesn’t have a primary. The revive gun is used as her primary and naturally you will use the card that improves your mercs primary AND special ability i.e quick charge and get-up. The same goes for all mercs, a lot of naders, artys and skyhammers wants the explodydenron. naturally the rhino players wanted to use the augments that improved their mercs special ability instead of some augments that lets you jump 10% longer. Bushwackers want turret upgrades, auras want healing reach etc etc.
I’m not arguing if the nerfs was correct or not but the reasoning behind it. Especially when it comes to sparks who doesn’t have a primary which I think is a mistake. If she had one I’m sure some players would’nt necessarily choose the cards with quick charge.
And by the way. Ironically nerfing the machine pistols creates an ever greater incitament to use the revive gun as primary.
![http://i.imgur.com/tLr134g.jpg[/spoiler]](http://i.imgur.com/tLr134g.jpg%5B/spoiler%5D){kind=link}