Reconsider Female Characters!


(Stroggafier) #421

An infraction? for expressing a viewpoint in an unconventional and light-hearted way? you must surely be mistaken…lots of creative people on this forum. So they should have easily seen your message for what is truly was, i.e. how not to use illogical association in considering female characters.

Are you sure it wasn’t something else?


(Ryan) #422

Nope, I got an infraction for that post. lol

You can check my user profile if u want :wink:

EDIT: Ow, other people can’t see the reason for infractions on my profile page.
Anyway, I checked, but I am not going to post the pm in this thread. It’s a private message after all :wink:


(Nail) #423

if you click on the yellow card on your post, it says Useless Post


(Ryan) #424

k :wink: Well the there u have it. After 3 years I make a useless post and get an infraction :P.


(Nail) #425

meh, they go away, I’ve had a few


(badman) #426

Skimming the last couple pages, it seems this thread has at last run its course. We appreciate everyone’s input on the issue.

If you don’t want to dig through 22 of discussion, have a look at the links below for the lowdown on why Brink’s an all-male affair in the character department:

http://www.splashdamage.com/forums/showthread.php?p=203448#post203448
http://www.splashdamage.com/forums/showthread.php?p=203705#post203705
http://www.splashdamage.com/forums/showthread.php?p=203457#post203457
http://www.splashdamage.com/forums/showthread.php?p=208442#post208442