So I’ve noticed this happening a lot. Many high level players gravitate towards what is currently the strongest and easiest loadout of them all. Fragger with M4A1. The M4A1 is the strongest weapon of the game right now, especially since all the ECHO data given by newcomers in Skyhammers mainly say that the M4A1 sucks. This is why it has been buffed to death. Then, the strongest merc that can use it being Fragger there are so many high level players playing this particular loadout and I feel that it shouldn’t be promoted.
Just as the Dreiss’s precision got nerfed back in the day as it was really powerful in strong players, I feel that the M4A1 and particularly the Fragger combo should be nerfed as well. It is really annoying to see that you can be doing very well with another class and still a Fragger with M4A1 will be king of the hill, because he has so many advantages that no other merc can compensate for.
I know some mercs are dedicated killers, but I believe that SD’s policy was to put people out of their comfort zones and to add attractiveness to other mercs as well. Now there is only that particular loadout that high level players gravitate to and it repeats the same thing that many other games have done and which to me is a capital sin: remove diversity.
In Modern Warfare 2 you will only find players with UMP45, in MW3 you’ll only find the mp7, etc. Always just the strongest weapon. I also agree with the argument that there will always be one particular weapon that outshines others, but especially in DB one has the possibility to balance it out with weaker mercs. So I would really enjoy to see some proper balancing there, in order to increase diversity and to remove the need to play one setup only to be competitive or just have an edge above other.