New Maps other than DLC!

(nephandys) #41

[QUOTE=Jimmy James;359535]
Good question. In the Security campaign “Day 6: Early Launch” is not a What-if but I assume Security is supposed to win that one. For Resistance the same map is “What-if: Operation Babel” and assuming they win that then the tower is definitely busted. So it seems that the DLC maps (or at least the Founders Tower) may be a What-if.

-JJ[/QUOTE]
There should be 4 missions total added to the campaign (looking at Achievements). One version of each map should theoretically be a What if and one version the reality. Generally speaking whoever is on offense is usually the winner in the plot line. The 1What If/1Reality idea appears to be the case especially since you can play each map as each side in the campaign and there’s a Campaign specific achievement for beating both as each side.

This is also the way they can get more bang for there buck in campaign with less maps. Make them playable by each side with one being the “What if” so people don’t have to point out that it would make no sense otherwise.

(Tandem) #42

mp_beach

(wolfnemesis75) #43

There has to be crazy people on the Ark. We need an asylum map. Wait, Brink is an asylum of sorts, from the destruction of the rest of the world. But you know what I mean. Te he he. :slight_smile:

(Affe_mit_Waffe) #44

how about giving us a sdk so the community can make loads of cool new maps?

oh wait then they cant release a dlc with 3 boring maps for 10 bucks forget about it -_-

(wolfnemesis75) #45

[QUOTE=Affe_mit_Waffe;365245]how about giving us a sdk so the community can make loads of cool new maps?

oh wait then they cant release a dlc with 3 boring maps for 10 bucks forget about it -_-[/QUOTE]

And I wouldn’t get to play the cool map the community made. I am on Xbox. One of the downsides. So I’d rather they keep making map packs. Sorry. :frowning: