New lobbies


(Tom2160) #1

Honestly, what is going through the devs heads right now. First of all it was the crappy trading system, which I was able to cope with; however, now they decided to remove the 6v6 servers on public games?

I don’t usually play on public servers anyway; however, considering it is somewhat hard to find a min lvl 10 server it’s ridiculous, since by what I’ve heard the majority of the community prefer smaller lobbies. This means if I can’t find a min lvl 10 to play on I don’t see why I should bother as I can’t play a 6v6 match anywhere else.

In my personal opinion I think the devs should really think about things before they decide to implement them into the game. So far they’ve been releasing some horrible ideas.

P.S. I do love the execution map, but too bad I don’t like the gamemode…

Whats your opinions on this?


(yesser) #2

i think they are doing these changes to make the game more comp
-in CMM test the matchs where 6vs6 and by changing the min lvl 10 and 20 servers 6vs6 only they will make veteran more used to that kind of match before the change

  • by making the max lvl 5 lvl 6 and 7vs7 they like helped to make like it was before since now xp become easier with the new badges and since 7vs7 is pretty much world war 1 ( 8vs8 obviously ww2) the game would feel more fun

-and by making the open servers 7vs7 and 8vs8 they did it for people that just want to shoot at things rondomly i guess


(Mr-Penguin) #3

8v8 is chaos, and nobody plays Min Level 10/20 servers.

SD, I want my non-restricted 6v6 servers back.

plz


(jokingShale) #4

I agree. Removing 6vs6 was a terrible idea, 6vs6 was all I ever played and even then I kind of hoped they would add 5vs5 in the future. But now they went the opposite way?

Smaller games are the ones that you can have by far the most fun in. Large ones are just a spam of abilities and people randomly flanking you constantly.

In my opinion 8vs8 should have been removed sooner than 6vs6.

I guess the only real thing I can do is still play at 4 in the morning and hope an entire game remains 2vs2


(Press E) #5

[quote=“jokingShale;195018”]I agree. Removing 6vs6 was a terrible idea, 6vs6 was all I ever played and even then I kind of hoped they would add 5vs5 in the future. But now they went the opposite way?

Smaller games are the ones that you can have by far the most fun in. Large ones are just a spam of abilities and people randomly flanking you constantly.

In my opinion 8vs8 should have been removed sooner than 6vs6.

I guess the only real thing I can do is still play at 4 in the morning and hope an entire game remains 2vs2[/quote]

I liked both, honestly. Sometimes crazy matches are fun, and sometimes I just want small games. They shouldn’t have removed either.
I’d rather see them think about their choices than adding a shitty overpriced crafting system and removing something a lot of players liked.


(XavienX) #6

Agreed, unfortunately we are dealing with SD here and this is far from the last horrible decision they will make.