Is stark AR better than BR16 now? The rate of fire is faster, damage is higher.

(Eox) #21

Just putting things clear : the rate of fire or Stark AR is higher, but BR-16 has a lower burst delay. In the end your DPS should be slightly higher with BR-16, but with the Stark it’ll be easier to fight at long range thanks to the higher fire rate of the burst itself.

(hoyes) #22

Imo the stark was always better, just required more skill to use, since the low mag cap and higher recoil, it made it more difficult to chain headshots, but you would outgun a br player easily if you knew what you were doing. Br is a good all rounder. Easier to use, has similar damage potential.

(ChuckJones) #23

The br has more damage potential out to 30 meters, but the stark is better at range.

(Tanker_Ray) #24

Stark has faster sudden burst RoF(857 nerfed to 800RPM) but BR-16 has slower burst RoF(800 nerfed to 720RPM), not burst delay.

BR-16’s burst delay is 0.216 sec, and Stark has 0.26 sec so the burst delay is shorter with BR.

Isn’t Stark the best gun for shooting far range? Besides the fact it’s OP, it’s just adorable when popping Vassili’s head with it. (Except the fact he can endure the triple headshot dmg all thanks to 110HP. Ah, damn it.)

(Eox) #25

Stark has faster sudden burst RoF(857 nerfed to 800RPM) but BR-16 has slower burst RoF(800 nerfed to 720RPM), not burst delay.[/quote]

I misspelled lower. D: