I think if they were to make a FlameThrower pistol, it could be pretty sweet. The pistol would have a small tank attatched to the back of the bottom of the grip, just like the carbon fiber compressed air tanks for paintball guns. As far as I know, that has NEVER been done in a game. What do you all think? It could look really sweet with a nice design and aggresive skin.
The player would carry like 2 extra bottles for ammo. It should not be never ending fuel, IMO.
Heh, I think this game has enough weps personally but with a limited range some defensive purpose weps like flamethrowers could be useful.
P.s. when making a topic ovoid using acronyms I had to think too hard about what the hell FT was supposed to mean 
No one likes this idea? I think it would be better than a full blown Flam Thrower.
Why not both? A smaller, compact one that does less damage for lights and a fullblown heavy mod FT.
I think a viable FT in the hands of a heavy could be the solution to spawn camping. I can invision the heavy coming out for sec in CC, holding down the back route to the courtyard, with the bot and “bot guards” coming out behind him as he trenches all of the first courtyard camping ****s. If done right, the FT is a thing of beauty Keep in mind, however, that this opinion is coming from a self proclaimed pyromaniac.
Dude…It wouldn’t even fit in cuz they’re low on fuel… and on top of that…they dont even have a regular flame thrower sooo…why would there be a flamethrower on a pistol??? The story of BRINK limits everything…including weapons, maps, abilities,… and girls (I’ll end the girl thing right there b4 it turns into a new thread…)
Dude, simply put, it WILL fit. They have mlitoves, pyromines, grenades, turrets etc etc etc. They have resources for all of that, then they have resources for the FT. Dont be so closed mind and simply say that it wont fit the story because actually, it will.
Also, how does the BRINK story limit it to males? There are no females on the Ark?
Why do you even bother making threads and asking for the opinions of others? Sounds to me like you already have it all figured out in your own little head, so why not just Email SD all the crap you are clogging the boards up with instead of trying to start an arguement with everyone who doesnt agree with you… You make how many threads and almost all of them go absolutely no where, if I was a bettin man I would say your an undercover troll in the guise of a big fan who actually disslikes everything about the game and the devs… That or well, your are just a little nuts and lost your marbles, maybe the Lost Boys can find them for you!
Seems to me like your trolling right now.
Im not argueing as to whether the gun should be in the game or not. I am argueing whether it would actually fit in the game, which, it would. If you dont like me debating what he said, too bad for you. Dont bring your high and mighty act at me. I have a right to respond to his comment as he had the right to respond to mine and in actual fact, his dialect is intented to start an arguement therefore, I am not STARTING anything. You could at least get the simple facts right.
Also, your post serves no purpose other than of an arguement. If thats not hypocricy, nothing is. As stated, take the high and mighty act somewhere else cause its just a fake ass show for a simple hypocrit.
I like the flame thrower idea. How about a automatic combat shotgun. For the heavy how about a M.I.R.V. Nade launcher. For the light a sawed off shotgun. As far as attachments goes a featherwieght clip it has less ammo but adds greatly towards accuracy, stability, and recoil control for pistols, smgs, and assault riffles.
Not a good idea, Brink’s maps tend to have a lot of chokepoints, we don’t want someone to spray the place with fire hoping to get a kill or two.
[QUOTE=HandOfGod;353847]Seems to me like your trolling right now.
Im not argueing as to whether the gun should be in the game or not. I am argueing whether it would actually fit in the game, which, it would. If you dont like me debating what he said, too bad for you. Dont bring your high and mighty act at me. I have a right to respond to his comment as he had the right to respond to mine and in actual fact, his dialect is intented to start an arguement therefore, I am not STARTING anything. You could at least get the simple facts right.
Also, your post serves no purpose other than of an arguement. If thats not hypocricy, nothing is. As stated, take the high and mighty act somewhere else cause its just a fake ass show for a simple hypocrit.[/QUOTE]
Ok, actually I wasn’t starting anything. All you man. However, it still doesn’t fit in. Sure they have all the other stuff, but a flame thrower on a pistol? you’d need a fuel tank and all that. On a pistol? Might as well put it on a AR. But, anyway…it won’t happen sooo…theres your answer to that one. I know I’m not a SD but your more than likely to get the same answer. :rolleyes:
If you like BRINK, don’t try to change it into Black Ops plzz…
Seriously though, your need for a flamethrower can be fulfilled by a simple push of the eject button and a switch of disks.
[QUOTE=thrill11;353923]
Seriously though, your need for a flamethrower can be fulfilled by a simple push of the eject button and a switch of disks.[/QUOTE]
flaming disk shooter=epic soldier/heavy weapon
