For owners of 2.55 Servers


(evil-uwe) #81

Hi all,

it’s partly an interesting conversation here and on Splatterladder.

The one have a “CoD Punkbuster” and the other a “new own Anti-Cheat Tool” (modified Jaymod /
config or whatever). Fascinating, when this is the truth.

But the problems with T.C and ETc have, in my opinion, nothing to do with EqualOne’s 2.55+, but this thread begins with the patch from him. What the others (F|A, Staatsschutz and so on) have, it is not
public and we can not downloading it. Ok, CoD PB is probably downloadable, but you know what I
mean.

You can make a new thread and discuss about the other things.

I think we can make a summary.

My summary is, that the patch (Windows-Version) from EqualOne is working. PB commands works.
It —> seems <---- that PB runs “normal” ( I think only Evenbalance can say it).
With PB - disable, it is not joinable.
Server is in the 2.55 serverlist, 2.55 Clients can connect.
2.60(b) do not playing any role, because the server is not in the serverlist, the normal players do
not know that he can play there.

Evil-Uwe


(Qualmi) #82

[QUOTE=evil-uwe;199093]and the other a “new own Anti-Cheat Tool” (modified Jaymod /
config or whatever). Fascinating, when this is the truth.[/QUOTE]

indeed. but for me they are in big trouble if they really have implemented a anti-cheat-tool. maybe even judicial ones. i dont know much about those things, but i can imagine that you need licences and stuff, caus a anti-cheat-tool is nothing harmless. it points access to your pc. thats hacking! its nothing you just create from scratch, just like that, like its normal. maybe me as a client dont want this server admin to do his (maybe good intended) job in my computer if i play very good and maybe considered as cheater by him. but im not a pro in judicial things. for now i simply do judgement by myself by not visiting those servers. thats a bit too far for me what they are doing. and if thats how the community will evolve in general, than it really deserves to die. decentralized anti-cheat-tools everywhere, access to your pc by not official persons, servers, where the anti-cheat-tool is on and off randomly to make it possible to use cheats at certain times, thats some hard stuff.

edit: and i know some may tend to say now: “its their own server. they can do what they want. dont talk crap qualmi” jea, they can do. but the problem by now is that you dont know nothing about this tool. there is no indicator for you as a client that its on or off. thats wild west!!!


(YourFather_CZ) #83

Why do you think this? Why?

I’ve thought it’s obvious… but it looks it’s not.
Admins on that servers scammed their players. That’s why their servers are listed.
And you trying to say: „selecting swindlers is bad!“?

Well I’m going to show you nice analogy from real life.

If you’re theif you can steal anything on any place you want and it’s very easy to steal if there is nobody who is trying to stop you. However, there is police which is trying to prevent you from stealing or stop you if you have already stolen something.
If there is no police it’s much more easier to steal stuff.

It’s same with PB and WolfET. If there is no PB enabled it’s much more easier to use cheats.

It’s even more easier to use cheats with older versions of WolfET besouse there are some terrible bugs which can be abused and cheats are more accessible for that versions.

Yes, scammers don’t like if they are revealed… :slight_smile:

[QUOTE=Qualmi;199094]
edit: and i know some may tend to say now: “its their own server. they can do what they want. dont talk crap qualmi”[/QUOTE]
This’s good point… and I’d like to add: Do they own servers? Definitely yes. But it’s what they possess only. They don’t own community or even community’s minds.


(Paul) #84

Ok, it’s clear by now that it’s not equalones patch problem, it’s something else.

About SL: If you think you can make something better, feel fry to try it :slight_smile: There are many years worked over the code, so I dont’think you can just make something better in just some months.

About F|A, there not using any form of patch, first they tried out but they removed because it didn’t worked so good.

And yes you can make your own anti-cheat system if you want, is Punkbuster, X-ray, or other variants also spyware or something? NO!

But aoub the main discussion, I say stop this now, it’s useless here. It’s not about the main topic anymore -> I would point you to the SL forums, where is a discussion on enabling/disabling ranking because of the FAKE pb.

  • I’m removing the list because people get crazy seems like it.

(YourFather_CZ) #85

[QUOTE=Paul;199106]

  • I’m removing the list because people get crazy seems like it.[/QUOTE]
    How many people exactly? Five… ten?
    And who is crazy? Those who are abusing bugs? Those who are even cheating? Admins of these servers? …or regular players?

Hidding the truth about these tricky servers is not good. It means making concession for scammers/cheaters/swindlers.


Cheaters really don’t like PBBans and PsB and is this reason to close these databases?

It’s normal that swindlers don’t like global list of swindlers…


(Pegazus) #86

I just checked your site Scary and I can still see the PB list hyperlink in the menu bar. It just leads to a dead end, i suggsest you to remove it from the menu. :slight_smile:
No use in keeping it there imo.


(aaa3) #87

been away 4some time, very interesting thread. sad that that list “had to” be taken down. btw original patch would/could’ve been a good idea.

and an off [long, nothing to do with the patch or the fake-pb-on, dont read unless giving a crap about 55v6b]:

[QUOTE=<Your>Father<CZ>;198914][digest-edited quote]
Lets talk about WHY.
possible reasons why playing v2.55:

  1. don’t know about newer version.
  2. don’t know almost anything about 2.60 and 2.60b features and fixes.
  3. want to use cheats or abuse/exploit bugs.

Somebody can say „I enjoy 2.55 more than 2.60b.“. This is result of 1), 2) or 3) only.

If you think there are different reasons why PLAYERS like 2.55 let me know.

If we are talking about 2.55 admins there is an extra reason why there are 2.55 servers: 2.55 admins are afraid of losing their players if they update their servers.

Statement „ 2.6b is nearly as buggy as 2.55“ is very far way off truth.

My conclusion is: 2.55 servers are filled with players and they are not upgraded to 2.60b due to:
I. „not knowing“ players
II. cheaters and bug abusers
III. administrators fears of losing their players if they update game[/QUOTE]
i could have a few remarks on that. 1, i think this (the first) list is seriously at fault. 1b, i think the server admin reason should be added as a 4) to the first list, even if in brackets to separate them from the 1st 3, for the sake of honesty; instead of hiding it somewhere midtext. the list is very definitely worded and visible, the admin thing is missing badly from there despite that that section is supposedly about players, as it is an important factor in thw whole issue. 1c, i think one important reason also, as an 5), players who know about 26b, know whats changed and actually like it, never ever cheated and they dont (can’t) move because of their fellow players, or irregulars, or, even some part of their regulars wouldnt move on. that is they’d lose their community. its a different reason from the server admin thing u mention, its a player’s decision, and it is noticeable on such scenarios when the community has both an 55 and 26b server.

i think that first triple list is either shows the poster really cant, or dont want, to understand (use his fantasy) why some ppl wanna use 55, and/or is very misleading and dont paints the situation correctly.

  1. is an entirely valid, resonable, and sadly, (because of outside factors out of control) prevalent reason for why r there ppl out there sticking with 55.

about that nearly-as-buggy thing i agree, even if its true, it is misleading as 26b should be wieved with pro and luas. and with those, sy in some other thread remarked, its nearly perfect and finished.


and to that conclusion, there should be as an III/b. if not IV.: “administrators losing their players if they update game”;
which is a distinct from III., and FACTUAL[, and sad] reason.

and the surprising misc. detail about this is, that on one server i know(n–havent plaed et 4a while), these players were mostly experienced and skilled ones, not having technical or any other issues, yet in practical life no matter what measures done by admins, players simply didnt turn on on the 6b server to make it viable.


and a note - this is not a defence of 55 or anything like that [i’m omnivorous w. patch selector and 'd love if nearly all servers 'd be of 60b] but simply a trial to refute a, for me seemingly faulty typical 60b-er(*) attack on an 55-er asking for understanding.
*:lack of (or faulty) insight into 55-er scene, overzealous attack of 55-ers. actually it states everybody who is not a noob is there coz he or she’s a cheater or condoning cheaters.


(ETplayerPro) #88

Ehm… guys

it works or not for NQ 1.2.7, 2.6b ?
and if yes, please explain

Thx.


(dwe_flame) #89

did the punkbuster problem already got fixed ?


(RedSector) #90

yes fixed.


(Boosted1981) #91

sorry for digging out an old thread but… D:

i just installed this on my server and it runs fine.
but one question remains, is there a way that my server shows up both as 2.55 and 2.60b?
since right now only 2.55 players will see, but obviously 2,60b players should see it too…any hint would be great. :slight_smile:


(Micha) #92

Et 3.0.0 can do this. It’s an unofficial release in which you install a 2.6b server but 2.55 clients are able to connect to the server.
More informations and download of the file can be found here: http://filebase.trackbase.net/et/server/et300_README.txt


(Boosted1981) #93

so basically i dont even need 2.55+?
instead i can just use 3.00 if i read that right yes?
just want to make sure im not mistaken :slight_smile:


(Micha) #94

Et 2.55+ is the same as et 3.0.0 both are unofficial and unlock 2.55 and 2.6b clients for the server. 3.0.0 is easier to use in my opinion.


(ETJump-Zero) #95

Except it breaks the physics for some random reason (trickjumpers might care). (+ binary being distributed without access to source code when the code is GPL’d)


(Boosted1981) #96

Using it for an Objective Server…so the Physics flaw isnt a problem.
I guess im gonna give this a shot then, cant be worse…and can always be put back to original state.
Thanks for the heads up :slight_smile:


(Mateos) #97

You may also have a look at this:
http://forums.warchest.com/showthread.php/31857-ET-Legacy


(Boosted1981) #98

Tried et300 but had to much problems…2.55 clients not able to download for example…
Does Legacy combine 2.55 and 2.60b too?
Couldnt find something about it.


(Mateos) #99

Nope afaik, but it’s the most maintained project atm, with loads of improvements server-side :slight_smile:


(diaboliksmart) #100

@Boosted1981: what problem do you have with 3.00 ???

If you manage to run 2.55+, you CAN manage ET 3.00 man !

Try without these 3 files: pak1.pk3 pak2.pk3 mp_bin.pk3 and just keep: pak0.pk3
And tell us the result !

V55