Do you like execution?

(RyePanda) #61

We basically already have rush, except instead of it always being a bomb plant, we have other objectives.

Also, ctf, domination, and base race would need symmetrical maps, which we have none of.

I don’t know what base race is, but ctf and domination don’t need symmetrical maps, especially not domination. Don’t think I’ve ever played a symmetrical domination map. And Asymmetrical CTF works fine if you just play it like stopwatch, two halves, alternate attack/defense.

Domination would probably work fine on the execution maps, just move the spawns and objectives around. I’d like to see domination, and I’d like to see them use the execution maps for something else so I get to play them too.[/quote]

I don’t want ctf to be bridge stage 3. Both teams should be attacking and defending at the same time.

(ImSploosh) #62

[quote=“RyePanda;138355”][quote=“Sploosh;137997”]I like it a lot, but I would prefer a “Demolition” type gamemode or a “Rush” type gamemode (from Bad Company 2 for instance). Or even capture the flag, domination, and base defense like in the recent poll.

Obviously we need more maps for stopwatch/objective, but other gamemodes should be implemented first in my opinion. I like to have a change in pace every once in a while. :D[/quote]

Isn’t rush just planting Mcoms? Also, ctf, domination, and base race would need symmetrical maps, which we have none of.[/quote]

Yeah it is, but the way it’s done is like infiltrating a new base each time. Plus, it’s not a one life gamemode. It would be a bit different from objective, but would require completely new maps to be honest. Lol I’m probably just having a nostalgia moment because there’s no way to play BFBC 1 or 2 again… At least not like years ago.

Weren’t those 3 gamemodes mentioned previously as something to be worked on? Of course new maps would be needed, but need more of those anyways. The maps we have are all so linear and boring for the most part. Just my opinion though. I hate invisible walls. :smiley:

(Atagi) #63
  • Copy of counterstrike
  • Only 2 maps
  • Unbalanced teams
  • Wait time
  • Most people go there for the missions only
  • More abilities spammers than tactical players.
  • Can’t always kick afk players because the vote system requieres everyone to vote yes whcih doesn’t happen

I did it for the missions only but now I got all mercs and don’t need the credits anymore so I just cancel the execution missions.

(Litego) #64

We basically already have rush, except instead of it always being a bomb plant, we have other objectives.

Also, ctf, domination, and base race would need symmetrical maps, which we have none of.

I don’t know what base race is, but ctf and domination don’t need symmetrical maps, especially not domination. Don’t think I’ve ever played a symmetrical domination map. And Asymmetrical CTF works fine if you just play it like stopwatch, two halves, alternate attack/defense.

Domination would probably work fine on the execution maps, just move the spawns and objectives around. I’d like to see domination, and I’d like to see them use the execution maps for something else so I get to play them too.[/quote]

I don’t want ctf to be bridge stage 3. Both teams should be attacking and defending at the same time.
[/quote]
And why can’t you attack and defend at the same time on an asymmetrical map?

(DMaster2) #65

I’d go as far as saying that with minor adjustments all the objective maps would be good for a domination/ctf mode.