lol, come on now.
The K121 does 17 damage per bullet compared to the Mk46’s 11 damage per bullet. Yes, the Mk46 has a much higher rof to put its DPS nearby the K121 but as even @Amerika can attest, it makes the gun noticeably weaker at range and enemies are able to escape much more often than running from a M4/burst rifle.
Let’s follow your exact line of logic then. Suppose the next patch lowered K121 damage from 17 to 8, increased the RPM from 477 to 1025, increased the magazine capacity to 120, and dramatically reduced the recoil and spread. Do you honestly believe for a moment that the K121 will remain competitive despite retaining the same DPS and damage output per mag? It would just be an Empire 9 with a much higher ROF, mag capacity, and range, with worse spread and movement penalty. Which coincidentally is the complaint about the Mk46 and its comparison to the KEK-10 right now.
I’d rather see an increase in bullet damage on the Mk46 and a lowered ROF/slightly lower mag capacity to make up for it[/quote]
I agree that higher damage per bullet is desirable, allowing a lot of new tactics and often winning engagements outright due to frontloaded alpha strikes.
Nevertheless ‘empire 9 with a much higher rof’ would be an extremely powerful gun! Do you ever get those moments where multiple empire9 HS absolutely shred the HP off the opponent? Yes K121 is stronger as is, but the gun you describe is still really really good.
I also agree that MK46 needs a buff! But I’d rather see the buff strengthening the situations where the gun is already advantageous. Higher RoF, bigger mag, less ADS swimming would all add to make MK46 the BEST MID-LONG RANGE automatic weapon.
Increasing damage and reducing RoF just makes MK46 a slightly different version of k121.