I was wodnering , I know its probably terrible, but should it take an hour and 15mins to compile a map with a “(single test) - light - faster” compile? I dont like htat it takes that long, maybe i am not doing the best compile… i jsut want to be able to see my map with the lights i put in. I will be testing my alpha version in probably a month so i want to make sure i am doing the right compile, becasue time is money!
COMPILE TIME GONE WACK!
Erus_Nauction
(Erus Nauction)
#2
umm i have a semi large sized map and it takes me like at most 15 mins. do you have a ton of lights?
lol
thegnat
(thegnat)
#5
BSP - meta does no light compile. Thats why its so fast. 1h and 15min is fast for a light compile, IMO.
Do a region-compile, if you want to see how the lighting comes along in certain places, that doesn’t take ages…
SCDS_reyalP
(SCDS_reyalP)
#6
Well, you would have to tell us something about your system in the complexity of the map for anyone to give you useful feedback if that is a reasonable time.
-faster is a low quality compile, and will likely be somewhat darker and higher contrast than a ful quality compile.
Since it is a (single test) command, you need to run BSP -meta and should also run vis or vis -fast before running it.
Danyboy
(Danyboy)
#7
If you want a comparrison - perform the same BSP method on goldrush then next week when it finishes let us know it it went
