On a map like Underground.
The enemy teams takes down the first objective in 5 minutes but doesn’t take the second objective.
Your team takes down the first objective in 3 minutes but the match continues on…
SplashDamage overlooked the logic here?
On a map like Underground.
The enemy teams takes down the first objective in 5 minutes but doesn’t take the second objective.
Your team takes down the first objective in 3 minutes but the match continues on…
SplashDamage overlooked the logic here?
Even if the game is technically won the game is not over -> you can still go do the 2nd objective to actually end the game, or else it’s just a fight for 15 mins.
I think this in a way, keeps it as a time balance because the game doesn’t really want to keep it unfair towards the 2nd team doing objective. I mean, so what if you did the first objective faster, you could have done it in 6 minutes and still win because of the 2nd objective being done while the first team couldn’t have done it.
Aka: First team do first objective, do nothing for the rest of time, second team do first objective slower than first team (thus it probably ending in the 2nd team’s defeat) but 2nd team does the 2nd objective too, while the first team didn’t -> 2nd team wins due to more objectives done.
Savvy?
[quote=“frolicsomeCrane;41476”]Even if the game is technically won the game is not over -> you can still go do the 2nd objective to actually end the game, or else it’s just a fight for 15 mins.
I think this in a way, keeps it as a time balance because the game doesn’t really want to keep it unfair towards the 2nd team doing objective. I mean, so what if you did the first objective faster, you could have done it in 6 minutes and still win because of the 2nd objective being done while the first team couldn’t have done it.
Aka: First team do first objective, do nothing for the rest of time, second team do first objective slower than first team (thus it probably ending in the 2nd team’s defeat) but 2nd team does the 2nd objective too, while the first team didn’t -> 2nd team wins due to more objectives done.
Savvy?[/quote]
Was this even English?
If the enemy team attacks first and does the first objective in five minutes but fails to take the second objective.
And your team after the half takes the first objective in 4 minutes, the match should end. It doesn’t matter if you take the second objective or not, you took the first one faster.
There is no possible way for the other team to win even if they hold you off the second objective.
Savvy?
Under this one condition, the match should not continue. But currently it does. I do not care about all the other scenarios and that is now what this thread is about.