BRINK no longer on STEAM top 100 played games

(NigelDocker) #21

[QUOTE=FireWorks;351615]Your figures are off…
373 now with peak of 737 BRINK[/QUOTE]

Unfortunatly his figures arent off, the last 2 days its gone below the top 100 list at the same sort of time and for more than a few hours[obviously when the cetain region isnt playing it much]
Just because it has a peak of 700 and 350 players now, which is firmly in the bottom 20 doesn’t mean it isn’t something near his figures when its not in the top 100…

People are entitled to make threads like this… let them. Just as a reminder to SD to get their fingers out their ass

(DarkangelUK) #22

I don’t think people are entitled to create the same recycled thread over and over instead of updating the same one. If it were up to me, anyone creating a new thread about player count would be given an infraction and banned for repeat offences.

(NigelDocker) #23

Why not? I cant see a topic on this in the first few pages maybe they just didnt search which isnt against the rules, they are entitled to if they want. You dont make the rules.

(FireWorks) #24

[QUOTE=NigelDocker;351619]Unfortunatly his figures arent off, the last 2 days its gone below the top 100 list at the same sort of time and for more than a few hours[obviously when the cetain region isnt playing it much]
Just because it has a peak of 700 and 350 players now, which is firmly in the bottom 20 doesn’t mean it isn’t something near his figures when its not in the top 100…

People are entitled to make threads like this… let them. Just as a reminder to SD to get their fingers out their ass[/QUOTE]

What you quoted was directed at the poster before me. He posted 13minutes before me and stated numbers not even half of the real size.

Its just laughable that people have to troll forums with lies and made up stuff.

But this was my last post here before the flamewar goes off. I apologize for falling to the flamebait.

(xTriXxy) #25

[QUOTE=FireWorks;351632]What you quoted was directed at the poster before me. He posted 13minutes before me and stated numbers not even half of the real size.

Its just laughable that people have to troll forums with lies and made up stuff.

But this was my last post here before the flamewar goes off. I apologize for falling to the flamebait.[/QUOTE]

steam stats shows you what?
servers stats shows you current number of PC players playing Brink on dedicated servers.

http://www.gametracker.com/search/brink/?searchipp=50#search

PROOF:

hint: count players

(NigelDocker) #26

[QUOTE=FireWorks;351632]What you quoted was directed at the poster before me. He posted 13minutes before me and stated numbers not even half of the real size.

Its just laughable that people have to troll forums with lies and made up stuff.

But this was my last post here before the flamewar goes off. I apologize for falling to the flamebait.[/QUOTE]

Well its a fact that there was less than 200 people on, so it would be no suprize it being 127… infact makes sense
And dropping down at one point to 66 players at the mninimum wouldn’t be that much of a suprize considering this either…

So if anyone is lying or making stuff up here it is you for saying that the numbers stated are not even half of the real size… becuae it is a fact there was less than 200 people on.

(tokamak) #27

You’re asking them to carry their own cross.

(.Chris.) #28

Yeah, I was totally been serious…

(sereNADE) #29

gametracker does not track every updated brink server, even if people are playing on it. in this case it might not matter as the general picture is not too far off the reality.

(xTriXxy) #30

next to it its steam server list.

(DarkangelUK) #31

I’m sorry where is this entitlement coming from? Make one thread, update it… what’s wrong with that? I never said I made the rules, but I said what I would do if I did.

(Wildes) #32

+1 if the DLC comes. I refuse to come back earlier. I will continue to play W:ET till then. And cry how great Brink could have been.

(NigelDocker) #33

You… lol

You said you dont think people are entitled to create the same recycled thread over and over.

I said Why not? theres no topic on the first few pages they could see, so what if they didnt use the search button, they are still very much entitled to do so… you dont make the rules, so they are entitled to do so…

lol whats the problem with that?

(DrD3ath) #34

Steam was offline for quite a time yesterday. If your steam can’t connect to steam servers you cannot join a Multiplayer agme (unless you direct connect).

(DarkangelUK) #35

[QUOTE=NigelDocker;351716]You… lol

You said you dont think people are entitled to create the same recycled thread over and over.

I said Why not? theres no topic on the first few pages they could see, so what if they didnt use the search button, they are still very much entitled to do so… you dont make the rules, so they are entitled to do so…

lol whats the problem with that?[/QUOTE]

I should search for a facepalm pic for you, but there isn’t one that would do this justice. No one is entitled to anything on here, you’re allowed to do so at the will of the admins and that’s it… so i’ll ask you again, where is this entitlement coming from? Why are they entitled to do what they want? You keep saying over and over that I don’t make the rules… where, in all of my replies on this entire forum to date, have I ever said I make the rules? Hell I even spelled it out for you in my original post and it’s subsequent reply that my proposed actions are what I personally would do. You think people are saying “I’m sick of seeing player count threads” because there haven’t been any? 1+1 dude, 1+1.

@xTriXxy

Your numbers are wrong. Steam counts all those that load the game, you’re looking at all those actively on an MP game visible on the server list. There’s those in the menus, listening to audio logs, customizing and messing with their loadout, or (like I do a lot) using devmap and messing around on maps on my own. So please, stop talking nonsense.

(NigelDocker) #36

You said you dont think people are entitled to create the same recycled thread over and over.

I said Why not? theres no topic on the first few pages they could see, so what if they didnt use the search button, they are still very much entitled to do so… you dont make the rules, so they are entitled to do so…

you are either entitled to do something or not…
Its not against the law… you are allowed within the law to do so …
And in this case you are entitled to post… lol

if you thought people weren’t entitled to do so then you need to find that facepalm pic and stick it on your forehead XD

(DarkangelUK) #37

Go look up the word ‘entitled’, then come back to me with a proper answer. Oh, and you started the ‘entitled’ thing first by saying they are entitled to create what threads they want… so please, explain why they’re entitled instead of sidestepping it. Answer it… what entitlement do they have to create what threads they want? Bloody hell man it’s not a difficult question, and saying “Why not?” doesn’t answer the question you’ve been asked.

I’m not entitled to create posts here, I’m allowed to by the admins… if they so choose to, without warning or provocation, they can delete every one of my posts and my account. You think I can do anything about that and claim entitlement? “But i’m entitled do post on your forums dammit!!”… oh I guess I need to add ‘lol’ as well apparently.

(nick1021) #38

[QUOTE=Je T´aime;351593]when are you guys stoping making new posts everyday about brink population and etc, we all know the numbers aren´t good, but why almost everyday make a new post about brink is dead / brink population …

This type of posts actually hurts the game, when a potential buyer looks at this sort of posts might think hmm a game with “only” multiplayer component and no players online = big fail so i wont buy it.

But anyway in euro I have always 5 or 6 full servers to choose from. (pc)[/QUOTE]
Yes, a game focused only on multiplayer with no players is a big fail. You would rather misinform the customers? Maybe if brink wants to get some sales, it shouldn’t fail next time.

(dommafia) #39

why dont people add the obvious trolls to ignore list? makes life easier.

(NigelDocker) #40

[entitled - qualified for by right according to law; “we are all entitled to equal protection under the law”]