Am I the only one to think MK46 (Thunder's MG) is garbage?

(vdll) #1

I keep trying to get myself into playing Thunder, but the spread on MK46 is outrageous. With K121 or assault rifles I’m getting headshots with consistency, but using MK46 I’m struggling to register bodyshots!

It’s not like I want to snipe with MG, but DAM, SON! Gotta connect at least some of those 85 bullets!

(Dawnlazy) #2

It’d decent up close and OK at range due to the good iron sights, but at mid range it’s atrocious. Really needs a tighter spread. I feel like the Stark is the only good weapon on Thunder.

(gg2ez) #3

It feels good when I’m playing it but I know that alot of others see it differently. In it’s current state, I feel like the MK46 is better when you use it like an SMG (up close, aggressive) instead of an Assualt Rifle (long-mid, passive). It’s pretty much the polar opposite of the K-121.

(vdll) #4

What I hate about MK46 most, is unexpectingly long TTK because of spread (despite hight DPS on paper) even if your aim is true.

(GiantGiant) #5

This gun is not a garbage but needs some buff. I was thinking about giving MK46 lower bullet spread or/and 12 damage per bullet.

(Reddeadcap) #6

It’s as bad as his concussion grenades.

(vdll) #7

Heh, after patch nades are slightly better :slight_smile:

(Szakalot) #8

i voted no cause its not garbage. shouldbe buffed thou

(vdll) #9

The vote options were: a) fix mk46; b) don’t fix mk46.

(Szakalot) #10

no: options were :

is it garbage? yes its garbage ans it needs a fix

is it garbage? meh, the poll surely is! :stuck_out_tongue:

(vdll) #11

You confused topic title with poll options my friend. Read attentively next time.

(Szakalot) #12

you confused the poll question with something… else.

poll question is:

Am I the only one to think MK46 (Thunder’s MG) is garbage?

(vdll) #13

you confused the poll question with something… else.

poll question is:

Am I the only one to think MK46 (Thunder’s MG) is garbage?
[/quote]

FYI, “Gotta fix MK46” is not an answer to a question “Am I the only one to think MK46 (Thunder’s MG) is garbage?”. If you fail to understand that, fine, we don’t need a pointless argument here. You want MK46 fixed, but you picked an answer to keep it as it is, whatever. Move along.

(SereneFlight) #14

I wouldn’t say it’s garbage but… it’s a big gun but feels like a peashooter.

(XavienX) #15

For me it feels fine honestly, but I guess the spread could use a slight use but it would be fine for me with no change.

(Sinsanatis) #16

pfff tbh, i rather have the hochfir instead of the mk46 for thunder.

(Amerika) #17

I don’t really like it yet I do a lot better with it than I would have thought. The only weapon that does more KPM for me is my Stark that I’ve become sort of ridiculous with lately.

(vdll) #18

KPM is weirdly calculated stat, I guess. i excel with k121 and struggle with mk46, but it remains similiar on both.

(Ballto) #19

im fairly middle of the road with this gun, im used to games you have to ADS the weapons and ive found its good at mid ranges if you ads it. could use a slight hipfire bloom and cof buff but i dont think its godawful

(vdll) #20

Actually, ADSing seems like the only way to get at least some accuracy with mk4t but having huge hitbox AND additionally slowing yourself down by ADSing is a risky business.