A lot more people seem to be okay with the changes to the Br-16 than the Stark AR. how about keep the Br-16 the way it is now, but roll back the Stark AR. The burst-fire weapons certainly wont seem alike then. 2 very different feeling weapons if that was the case.
But as of now, the Stark AR is simply horrendous.
I’m trying to wonder why the burst rifles were touched in the first place? It’s not like there was anyone complaining about it. So how did they come to the conclusion that the rifles needed to be messed with?
Pretty sure most players are wondering this too.[/quote]
I think it was because of the mousewheel thing, but the burst rifles didn’t need to be nerfed that much…
Pretty sure most players are wondering this too.[/quote]
I think it was because of the mousewheel thing, but the burst rifles didn’t need to be nerfed that much…[/quote]
So instead of curing cancer they just burned all the cancer patients and called it a deal?
Pretty sure most players are wondering this too.[/quote]
I think it was because of the mousewheel thing, but the burst rifles didn’t need to be nerfed that much…[/quote]
So instead of curing cancer they just burned all the cancer patients and called it a deal?[/quote]
Pretty much.
Pretty sure most players are wondering this too.[/quote]
I think it was because of the mousewheel thing, but the burst rifles didn’t need to be nerfed that much…[/quote]
So instead of curing cancer they just burned all the cancer patients and called it a deal?[/quote]
Certainly seems that way 
I love the Stark AR, and I really don’t want them to change it back. My grandeur training has definitely helped me learn to control the gun, and I no longer feel like my CW Stoker card is useless, this thing hits like a tank and you have to be patient in order to get kills with it. Therefore I love it. =)
FYI @MissMurder said she was cosplaying as Joy from Inside Out.
@sentimentalDime I know she was ^^ I just think she looked more like Kira ;)[/quote]
@Faraleth
Huh… She looked nothing like Kira to me, but to each is own i guess…
When a friend of mine played Dome, which he had never played before, his description of it was, “you can fit Skyrim in here”. He’s not wrong.
And I know that the servers aren’t being refreshed properly right now. I was trying to autojoin the server Scarfino was on for his stream and I never could get in because the server never updated with a proper player list. I could see that the server dropped multiple people at the end of one game but I couldn’t join it due to it still showing full on my end. That was neat.
I hope it’s likely that they may look into the possibility of changing the Trade-In System in the near future.
I tried to phrase that the way they talk to us…
99.9% sure everyone is completely upset with the changes. What else kind of response are you guys looking for? :([/quote]
There is an existing survey about it and I am 100% certain that 99.9% of people are not completely upset with the changes. Quite a few people didn’t care, some liked it. However yes, there was a good amount of people unhappy with the changes.
99.9% sure everyone is completely upset with the changes. What else kind of response are you guys looking for? :([/quote]
I’m guessing that they will be looking at performance data as well as feedback. If a bunch of people complain on the forums but the in game stats look decent (people still use them and are effective with them), then SD will probably just wait out the yells.
On the other hand, if there are a grand total of 2 people using them post-nerf and neither guy is doing particularly well, then they will probably get buffs of some sort. I don’t use the guns myself (pre or post nerf), so I can’t comment on their actual current state.
The BR-16 needs to be reverted, seriously, that gun was totally fine before.
The Stark was absolutely terrible. It should stay the way it is however, as it is cemented as a precision damage rifle, while the BR is clearly for more close quarters engagements.
Arty with BR-16 was my most popular set up. Now its gone. I really do hope nexxon that you guys will take this feedback to SD! Why even doing this change? is it just to see how community reacts ? I certainly don’t understand.
I certainly don’t understand either.
[/quote]
Because apparently you cannot simply cap the rounds per minute and thus disabling the mouse-wheel bound fire routine. Instead we must “balance” the weapons as well.
99.9% sure everyone is completely upset with the changes. What else kind of response are you guys looking for? :([/quote]
There is an existing survey about it and I am 100% certain that 99.9% of people are not completely upset with the changes. Quite a few people didn’t care, some liked it. However yes, there was a good amount of people unhappy with the changes.[/quote]
More than 2/3 of the player that cared about the Burst Rifle change are unhappy with it or downright HATE it.
If 2/3 of a countries population hates a party and then that party gets elected and becomes the leading one, there has to be something wrong, no? Or if 2/3 of the people taking my medication would get bad side effects, I wouldn’t much money off it and eventually take it off the market, no? Actually I don’t think I’d ever produce more than the initial pills.
2/3 is ALOT, especially considering that only about 5% of the total voters in the survey find the change to be good.
This is not considering that the Burst Rifles DIDNT NEED A CHANGE AT ALL because the M4 is out there and there was no information about a nerf for that piece of **** again.
