[quote=“TndY;99686”][quote=“Grave Knight;99452”]Blishlok has a DPS of 120. Hochfir has a DPS of 122. SMG-9 has a DPS of 124. Hochfir and SMG-9 do less damage per round but have higher RPM and larger magazine. They also both have less recoil allowing for easy multiple headshots.
Blishlok is the poor weapon you’re talking about.
And just to be clear. KEK-10 has a DPS of 128 and the Crotzni has a DPS of 130. Both of which have larger magazine and less recoil than the Blishlok. So they too can get multiple headshots easier than the Blish even though they don’t need to.
18 damage per shot at 6.67 shots per second is not better than 12 damage per shot at 10.83 shots per second (rounded to the nearest hundredths). Or 9 damage per shot at 13.53 shot per second for that matter.[/quote]
I thought we were past stating the obvious, but okay.
We’re all aware of the stats (at least should be),
but good stats on paper don’t always translate in-game,
that’s the point of this conversation.
[quote=“gg2ez;98835”]
Did you read the part where I said beaten in DPS?
Just in case you don’t know what that means, I’ll elaborate. DPS means Damage Per Second, sure, each Blish bullet does more damage but other SMGs higher RoF makes their DPS higher.
Blish’s damage doesn’t put anything to shame.[/quote]
Stating the obvious about DPS and repeating stats brings nothing new to the topic.
Yes, damage per bullet, it shames the rest.[/quote]
“Stating the obvious” doesn’t really seem to be getting through to you though, if it’s so obvious then why do keep insisting that the Blish outperforms every other gun, it doesn’t.
As I said before, you just can’t quote the Blish as superior equipment in this game. Playstyle and preference is the Blishes only defence and if you wanna try convince people to use the Blish, mentioning it’s performance isn’t going to help you.
In the end DPB<DPS, besides the Blish has like only 6 more DPB than our frontrunner.