[QUOTE=NIDCLXVI;347311]I want my accurized lacerator and “p’tang” sound!!! :oppressor:
I love how some people who played ETQW are complaining, yet the AR and lacerator had spread, the Hyper had spread all over your face, and then when you got scoped/accurised you could stop scope and burst headshots all over the show, just like with scope and handle grip… very similar, yes?
Loving my improved gotlung! 
Thanks for a great game SD! :stroggtapir:[/QUOTE]
no sh1t…
This thread is useless, why copy mine which had other options, to put in a poll where the change you have made has got no votes? Also you were wrong in your OP and this thread should be closed, theres an 11 page thread with a lot of good discussions already here.
He was trying to prove a point to NID, which he did… just not the one he was aiming for.
[QUOTE=RaKeD;347303]By making SMG’S still very accurate on distance (almost no spread) but reduce their damage via the “Range” value = less damage on distance and making it harder to hold down fire because of an increased recoil we would have an even better result in my opinion.
To make it really perfectt this can be further tweaked so using hip firing has more recoil and using AS reduces recoil so AS still has it s place in the game and is useful for long distance shooting.[/QUOTE]
Sounds pretty much like the ET:QW mechanics which had a very good distinction between ironsighting/hip fire imho.
He is trying to see how the voting may differ when the thread/poll asks the question less biasedly? Not so much to prove a point, as we know that only a very vocal small % of BRINK players come here, and we know usually to vent about issues or get a change they want, content gamers are too busy playing to see the forum, let alone post/poll. But his effort should be praised! Wel done for trying.
Still, interested in seeing if this small adjustment produces the slightest variance.
Omfg, you find excuses to everything. Just admit your wrong and most of the players want tighter spread, less damage.