EvacZone Clan Cup | Teams only | (Saturday 12th October)

(Kl3ppy) #101

I thought you are playing for us (biatch)?

(potty200) #102

I think, with around 8 teams turning up, we have enough for the first one day cup event for extraction. I hope we find more out about NDA stuff soon so we can see if there is a way to show other closed BETA players the semi finals/Finals. Hopefully they give us a great game or two to slap up on youtube for people to view. As someone who plays games for the competitive side of things. The first thing I do before playing scrims is watch a few video’s to try get my head around the way to play.

(k0k0nat) #103

I thought you are playing for us (biatch)?

Oh… I’ve red only the half of the topic of the intern DB Channel @ IRC.

:3

Yes, then ill play for biatch :smiley:

(Finko) #104

I think will be good idea make another one after release CB.

(trickykungfu) #105

please add 1 soldier, 1 Shotgun and 1 sniper rule! :wink:

(Winnie) #106

push for this rule!

(attack) #107

why 1 sniper and 1 shotgun?

(trickykungfu) #108

because that makes sense

(attack) #109

therse classes arent overpowert.
shotgun is only< in close fights usefull and sniper is in a cup not a big deal
soldier i agree ,field maybe only 2 per team

(Seanza) #110

No. No. No.

Restrictions should be avoided for the following reasons:

  • This is a test, not a finalised game. We need to show how prominent imbalances are by having no restrictions.
  • Restrictions create divides between pub play and competitive play. I (and I think everybody else who is into comp play) wants to have the easiest cross-over for newcomers from pub to comp. And I think I speak for absolutely EVERYBODY, when I say we need the game to be balanced well from release.

So no… no restrictions.

(fragon89) #111

from last drafts we did use restrict for 2 fops and yet we played with 1 most of the time
cuz other classes are more needed.
i dont think we’ll see 5 fops team

(Mustang) #112

Agree with Seanza, comp restrictions are introduced because of imbalance.

The ideal would be complete balance and no restrictions and we’re in a unique position to be able to provide the feedback to achieve this.

(trickykungfu) #113

oh this will make a lot of fun then…

(Seanza) #114

“Fun” is subjective my friend.

(fzl) #115

only restrictions can bringing the motivation back to all players!!

see “5fops spamming” see “shotguns” and many more

i prefered this

max. 2fops
max. 2meds
max.1assault
max.1recon
max. 1shotgun
max.2eng …per team…

or make evaczone the cup rulez alone? i think a poll ends this discussion perfectly!

(chippy) #116

I agree with Seanza. Introducing restrictions now, when the characters and weapons aren’t finalized seems somewhat redundant. I do understand peoples wishes to see such a system being used as it stands right now though.

(zeroooo) #117

[QUOTE=fzl;475000]only restrictions can bringing the motivation back to all players!!

see “5fops spamming” see “shotguns” and many more

i prefered this

max. 2fops
max. 2meds
max.1assault
max.1recon
max. 1shotgun
max.2eng …per team…

or make evaczone the cup rulez alone? i think a poll ends this discussion perfectly![/QUOTE]

THIS, is the biggest nonsense ive ever read!

why restrict anything??? SD wants the game to be balanced without anything! so lets do this!

just play the game,

(ejr) #118

Class restrictions this early on in an Alpha/CBT cup would be a bad move. Glad to see it won’t happen.

(potty200) #119

To end this discussion now. Rules will be made with a select group of players but I can reveal no class restrictions will be in place. No need for polls or to continue with this right now as it would be too hard to manage without the direct cvars in place. To avoid Amy issues this is the best solution for now. Rules will be posted soon.

(Seanza) #120

Amy is real pesky at times.