Engineer's Turrets too Weak ?


(MastaPiff) #21

I kinda agree on the lock on kinda being off… I’ve sat behind my turrent & watched op’s walk up 2 the front n hack it with me watching rite behind it! LOL it seems the lock on for turrents is like 3 seconds of standing in its face, anything less n turrent won’t shoot… only the gatling turrent locks on like it should.

Often it helps 2 plant a mine in a doorway then a turrent on the flank aiming at the mine so the mine warms the enemy up a gives the pokey turrent 3 sec to lock on, then the turrent will finish the enemy… but with a lite or med. turrent sometimes it still won’t spot em! Even if the turrent is super close to the mine.

Turrent lock on improve? Yes, just a lil’. Turrent health improve no… Unless I’m a soldier or I haven’t used a gnade in a minute it takes too many precious bullets for me to kill a turrent when I could use them on ur face! Lite & med. turrents suck with the lock on so bad I often use them to stand behind… they’re basically crouched riot shields that have a 30% chance of shooting back LOL. Gatling turrents are ok tho but sometimes they fail also but the range they cover makes that not hard 2 deal with.

Lite & mediums turrents seem a waste of skill pnts. I look at it like 3 skill pnts. for the gatling or none at all. I even just save 3 skill pnts. til I’m ranked up enuff for the gatling turrent… setting up & repairing the lighter turrents cost me my life more than they get me kills LOL…


(xdc) #22

it would be nice to see other engineers repairing their teammates turret more often


(Stormchild) #23

turrets behing very easy to damage/ destroy, at least they could have a little better acquisition rate (or make it a turret buff from engy or… Operative ? yet another possibility to make operative more useful in defense).


(Smoochy) #24

[QUOTE=BaNeJuDgEmEnT;362581]Just wondering how the community feels about the engineer’s turret ability. It seems to me IMO they really do not acquire targets fast enough and they are way too weak in terms of armor. I first noticed this when playing online when an enemy operative walked right in front of my turret and proceeded to hack at the mean time my turret just sat there like nothing was going on ? And it seems that one hand grenade is bye bye turret. Just wanted to see what everybody else thought about this?

:confused::penguin:[/QUOTE]

its odd. i have been killed in a second by enemy turrets but ive seen mine killed in 1 burst by lights. nothing more annoying than watching the enemy run towards your turret and it not even shoot at them.

the gatling one isnt too bad but thats 3 used abilities.


(wolfnemesis75) #25

The Gatling Turret and combination of 2 mines is pretty good. Two Gatling Turrets (2 engies) and four mines is really powerful. Three Gatling Turrets… hence the current HP of turrets. :slight_smile:


(Smoochy) #26

uses up a lot of ability points though. my level 20 engi/soldier has the gatling and 2 mines but its 4 ability points for all those. my jacks mostly dont have the turrets as level 1&2 arent worth having.


(FireWorks) #27

So that your fault for playing jack chars then… I understand why someone wants to have a jack char but at the end of the day the result with it is just bad compared to a proper char.


(Jimmy James) #28

I don’t think he was complaining.

I like playing my jack character. In fact my wife and I like to double-team the enemy with double jacks! (Mmm, double jack.) Neither of them use turrets. It’s not a problem, they just require different strategies. Plus, I like being best in almost all categories at the end of the match, it’s funny!

Anyway, I don’t really see turrets being all that useful if you play a jack anyway. Every time you change your class your turret disappears.

-JJ


(Smoochy) #29

odd, i almost always win the map with top score and often do most of the objectives too. i call your bluff there :slight_smile: i do what i need to. im flexible. my jacks can outplay any full class char as i can swap to whatever is needed and have useful tools. im not reliant on someone else doing the objectives

its not like all the abilities are that great. some are pretty useless.


(FireWorks) #30

Guess we have to settle this on the servers then :smiley:


(Smoochy) #31

i will be on tonight. when steam updates. ive also run out of weed so prepare for more aggressive play than normal :slight_smile:


(RabidAnubis) #32

We have a lot of drug users on SD


(Jimmy James) #33

Hey! It’s called “medicine” in Califnornia!

-JJ


(Cep) #34

I love that idea!


(Cep) #35

[QUOTE=Smoochy;363241]its odd. i have been killed in a second by enemy turrets but ive seen mine killed in 1 burst by lights. nothing more annoying than watching the enemy run towards your turret and it not even shoot at them.

the gatling one isnt too bad but thats 3 used abilities.[/QUOTE]

Amen brother!


(Smoochy) #36

yeah, drugs are bad m’kay…

but ones the government makes massive amounts of cash on via TAX are ok (even though any scientist will tell you alcohol and cigarettes are worse for you that most illegal drugs)

these days i rarely drink but i do enjoy my herbal cigarettes :slight_smile: i dont do any pills and powders any more… too old for that stuff these days (plus they are crap compared to the 90s! :))


(FireWorks) #37

Yes about the cash, and a No on the scientists. You can present a couple of statistics where alcohol and cigarettes cause a very high case number of illnesses/diseases(right terms?) and that they are a massive problem to a society. However, “most illegal drugs” have a very high potential to screw you the hard way in a much shorter time, maybe even first dose.

While there are a lot of differing studies about the effects of marihuana from either side, its is uncontested that it does a good amount of damage to teenager brains.


(Smoochy) #38

[QUOTE=FireWorks;364828]Yes about the cash, and a No on the scientists. You can present a couple of statistics where alcohol and cigarettes cause a very high case number of illnesses/diseases(right terms?) and that they are a massive problem to a society. However, “most illegal drugs” have a very high potential to screw you the hard way in a much shorter time, maybe even first dose.

While there are a lot of differing studies about the effects of marihuana from either side, its is uncontested that it does a good amount of damage to teenager brains.[/QUOTE]

im talking E and weed really here. both considered vastly less dangerous than alcohol and tobacco (and that was a government study - they sacked the scientists after that!). alcohol also accounts for the majority of violent crime and murder in the UK. we dont have the issues with crack like the USA. heroine here is the big bad one as its much cheaper, but they are just skinny burglars that dont really scare anyone.

also in regards to weed. i agree kids shouldnt smoke it. but in terms of mental health i read in interesting study last year. 1 in 10 people will have a psychotic episode in their normal lives. 1 in 20 weed smokers will have a psychotic episode. statistically weed smokers are half as likely to have mental health issues. interesting? it is also known to bring out schitzophrenia, not cause it (thts never been proved - ever!), so it actually shows nutter early, not create them. i know hundreds of pot smokers and nobody has issues. plenty of people i know have had big issues with alcohol. i know several alcoholics.

the fact is that pot was made illegal in the USA due to poor black workers and the cotton industry, cocaine was actually made illegal 50 years after pot!

sorry to bang on. its something i know a lot about :slight_smile:


(FireWorks) #39

[QUOTE=Smoochy;364844]im talking E and weed really here. both considered vastly less dangerous than alcohol and tobacco (and that was a government study - they sacked the scientists after that!). alcohol also accounts for the majority of violent crime and murder in the UK. we dont have the issues with crack like the USA. heroine here is the big bad one as its much cheaper, but they are just skinny burglars that dont really scare anyone.

also in regards to weed. i agree kids shouldnt smoke it. but in terms of mental health i read in interesting study last year. 1 in 10 people will have a psychotic episode in their normal lives. 1 in 20 weed smokers will have a psychotic episode. statistically weed smokers are half as likely to have mental health issues. interesting? it is also known to bring out schitzophrenia, not cause it (thts never been proved - ever!), so it actually shows nutter early, not create them. i know hundreds of pot smokers and nobody has issues. plenty of people i know have had big issues with alcohol. i know several alcoholics.

the fact is that pot was made illegal in the USA due to poor black workers and the cotton industry, cocaine was actually made illegal 50 years after pot!

sorry to bang on. its something i know a lot about :)[/QUOTE]

Ah I like you, but we should be careful about the impressions we leave here on others.
Phew… where to start… and i hope my vocabulary will be sufficient.

E itself is known to cause damage to the nervous system. Depending on your location you will have trouble to find “sober” E. At the moment it is very common to find it mixed with always changing experimental psychotic substances. Experimental in the sense of “I as drug chemic blend it in and see if users survive, like it and buy more”. Well thats for Vienna. Source: “check it” - drug analysis service in front of discos.
So we got E that is known for crippling the nervous system and whatever comes into the mix. Things should get better on the market though, as we changed the drug law to make those substances illegal by default. Before every new substance had to be forbidden and was then exchanged for a new experimental one.

Yes, there is a high correlation between violent crimes and alcohol.

Heroin is a more interesting thing, as it does no damage to your organs. You could take it up to high ages - if you get pure heroin. Hard to get it pure though and again the mixes and consuming techniques have a lot of negative potential. Heroin isnt that big here though. Oddly enough Vienna is the only city where we have users starting their carrier with the actual substitution drug. Hard to properly refine the pills(?) to the liquid injection form though and many users get incredible ugly wounds from the badly filtered liquid.

I havent heard of this study about only 5% of smokers would get a psychotic episode. But I must say, a lifetime prevalation of 10% for psychotic episode seems low, with a point prevalation of 1% for schizophrenia, but I dont got my psychiatry scripts here to check.
But the conclusion you make is simply wrong: “statistically weed smokers are half as likely to have mental health issues.” Your study was about psych episodes, you leave out all the other “funny stuff” like the affective disorders, personality disorders,…
As you stated, weed can trigger schizophrenia and those can be really fat episodes. However its also not proven that those people would have never had an episode in their life.

From an internship where i also worked with some schizophrenic people, I know some that got there over weed. And if you know hundreds of smoking people, statistically theres 1% of them schizophrenic, but you would unlikely know about it as its still a social “taboo” to have it mental problem though it gets better with depressions and burnout.
But experiences arent what we wanted to talk about :wink:

After all there are definitly good effects in everything (in the whole life), but you should never forget about the downsides to easily. If it works for you, fine, but it doesnt for everybody. And those that get hit, get hit badly.

Phew… sorry if i missed some points or made them too quirky. Still takes me a lot of concentration to write and do it in english even more.


(nephandys) #40

I work in mental health at Johns Hopkins. I was just talking to a schizophrenia researcher here and the findings he presented were that your chances go from roughly 10% in the normal population of teenagers (in the general population you are looking at more like a 1% chance so don’t get freaked out) like you suggested to 1 out of 4 or 25% chance of having a psychotic break. They’re also finding links to increased risk of depression, anxiety, etc. These are all correlations though - so they’re saying that MJ and these issues go hand in hand, but not that the MJ causes the break or other form of mental illness. Plus there’s all the normal effects of smoking - COPD, emphezema (sp?), cancer (this one for MJ is a bit up in the air), etc.

I’m totally pro people smoking MJ and I’m not suggesting you should stop, I just wanted to share this info with you . I think the real takeaway with any form of drug and alcohol use is to wait as long as possible to engage in use because more brain development will have taken place. One of the most important parts of your brain (the front lobe - controls thoughts about and planning for the future, considering consequences, etc. the lack of this is why teenagers do stupid things) is not finished developing until you are at least 21 and in some cases older. Effects on this development are likely the reason why you see the increased risk of mental illness, but like I said that’s far from a definitive conclusion.

On Topic: I like turrents.

Edit: I missed the above post before posting mine and it certainly serves to highlight a lot of the same ideas. This topic is so deep and broad though that it would take entire books worth of posts to really discuss all the data out there.